Sevilla-Ortega Lourdes, Ferrándiz-Pulido Lara, Palazón-Carrión Natalia, Álamo de la Gala María Del Carmen, de Toro-Salas Rubén, Garnacho-Montero José, Marcos-Rodríguez José Antonio, Agudo Martínez Ana, Araji-Tiliani Omar, Calvo-Morón María Cinta, Barquero-Aroca José Miguel, Fernández-López Antonio Ramón, Jaime-Borrego José María, Santos-Jiménez Juan Carlos, Moreno-Ramírez David, de la Cruz-Merino Luis
Clinical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Dermatology Department, Universitary Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41003 Seville, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 31;13(21):5485. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215485.
Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a locoregional procedure indicated by the unresectable melanoma of the limbs. Its complexity and highly demanding multidisciplinary approach means that it is a technique only implemented in a few referral centers around the globe. This report aims to examine its potential role in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy by conducting a systematic review of the literature on ILP.
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. The eligibility criteria included publications from 2000-2020 providing valid data o effectiveness, survival or toxicity. Studies in which the perfusion methodology was not clearly described, letters to the editor, non-systematic reviews and studies that applied outdated clinical guidelines were excluded. To rule out studies of a low methodological quality and assess the risk of bias, the following aspects were also required: a detailed description of the applied ILP regimen, the clinical context, follow-up periods, analyzed clinical endpoints, and the number of analyzed ILPs. The disagreements were resolved by consensus. The results are presented in tables and figures.
Twenty-seven studies including 2637 ILPs were selected. The median overall response rate was 85%, with a median complete response rate of 58.5%. The median overall survival was 38 months, with a 5-year overall survival of 35%. The toxicity was generally mild according to Wieberdink toxicity criteria.
ILP still offer a high efficacy in selected patients. The main limitation of our review is the heterogeneity and age of most of the articles, as well as the absence of clinical trials comparing ILP with other procedures, making it difficult to transfer its results to the current era.
ILP is still an effective and safe procedure for selected patients with unresectable melanoma of the limbs. In the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, ILP remains an acceptable and reasonable palliative treatment alternative, especially to avoid limb amputations. The ongoing clinical trials combining systemic therapies and ILP will provide more valuable information in the future to clarify the potential synergism of both strategies.
孤立肢体灌注(ILP)是一种针对肢体不可切除黑色素瘤的局部区域治疗方法。其复杂性和对多学科方法的高度要求意味着这是一种仅在全球少数转诊中心实施的技术。本报告旨在通过对ILP相关文献进行系统综述,探讨其在靶向治疗和免疫治疗时代的潜在作用。
检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。纳入标准包括2000年至2020年发表的提供有效性、生存率或毒性有效数据的文献。排除灌注方法描述不清晰的研究、给编辑的信、非系统综述以及应用过时临床指南的研究。为排除方法学质量低的研究并评估偏倚风险,还要求以下方面:所应用的ILP方案的详细描述、临床背景、随访期、分析的临床终点以及分析的ILP数量。分歧通过协商解决。结果以表格和图表形式呈现。
共纳入27项研究,包括2637例ILP。总体缓解率中位数为85%,完全缓解率中位数为58.5%。总生存期中位数为38个月,5年总生存率为35%。根据Wieberdink毒性标准,毒性一般较轻。
ILP在特定患者中仍具有较高疗效。我们综述的主要局限性在于大多数文章的异质性和年代久远,以及缺乏将ILP与其他治疗方法进行比较的临床试验,这使得难以将其结果应用于当前时代。
对于选定的肢体不可切除黑色素瘤患者,ILP仍然是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。在靶向治疗和免疫治疗时代,ILP仍然是一种可接受且合理的姑息治疗选择,尤其是为了避免肢体截肢。正在进行的将全身治疗与ILP相结合的临床试验未来将提供更有价值的信息,以阐明两种策略的潜在协同作用。