Kang Eunjeong, Park Sehoon, Park Jina, Kim Yaerim, Park Minsu, Kim Kwangsoo, Kim Hyo Jeong, Han Miyeun, Cho Jang-Hee, Lee Jung Pyo, Lee Sik, Kim Soo Wan, Park Sang Min, Chae Dong-Wan, Chin Ho Jun, Kim Yong Chul, Kim Yon Su, Choi Insun, Lee Hajeong
Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;41(1):102-113. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.042. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
Long-term outcomes of live kidney donors remain controversial, although this information is crucial for selecting potential donors. Thus, this study compared the long-term risk of all-cause mortality between live kidney donors and healthy control.
We performed a retrospective cohort study including donors from seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Persons who underwent voluntary health screening were included as controls. We created a matched control group considering age, sex, era, body mass index, baseline hypertension, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and dipstick albuminuria. The study outcome was progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and all-cause mortality as identified in the linked claims database.
We screened 1,878 kidney donors and 78,115 health screening examinees from 2003 to 2016. After matching, 1,701 persons remained in each group. The median age of the matched study subjects was 44 years, and 46.6% were male. Among the study subjects, 2.7% and 16.6% had underlying diabetes and hypertension, respectively. There were no ESKD events in the matched donor and control groups. There were 24 (1.4%) and 12 mortality cases (0.7%) in the matched donor and control groups, respectively. In the age-sex adjusted model, the risk for all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the donor group than in the control group. However, the significance was not retained after socioeconomic status was included as a covariate (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-3.80).
All-cause mortality was similar in live kidney donors and matched non-donor healthy controls with similar health status and socioeconomic status in the Korean population.
活体肾供者的长期预后仍存在争议,尽管这些信息对于选择潜在供者至关重要。因此,本研究比较了活体肾供者与健康对照者全因死亡的长期风险。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了韩国7家三级医院的供者。接受自愿健康筛查的人作为对照。我们根据年龄、性别、时期、体重指数、基线高血压、糖尿病、估计肾小球滤过率和试纸法蛋白尿情况创建了匹配对照组。研究结局为进展至终末期肾病(ESKD),以及在关联索赔数据库中确定的全因死亡。
我们筛查了2003年至2016年期间的1878名肾供者和78115名健康筛查受检者。匹配后,每组各有1701人。匹配研究对象的中位年龄为44岁,46.6%为男性。在研究对象中,分别有2.7%和16.6%患有潜在糖尿病和高血压。匹配的供者组和对照组均未发生ESKD事件。匹配的供者组和对照组分别有24例(1.4%)和12例死亡病例(0.7%)。在年龄-性别校正模型中,供者组全因死亡风险显著高于对照组。然而,在将社会经济地位作为协变量纳入后,这种显著性未保留(校正风险比,1.82;95%置信区间,0.87-3.80)。
在韩国人群中,健康状况和社会经济地位相似的活体肾供者与匹配的非供者健康对照者的全因死亡率相似。