Suppr超能文献

比较 ADVIA Centaur® XP 化学发光系统在印度献血者中筛查 HBV、HCV、HIV 和梅毒的效果。

Comparative evaluation of ADVIA Centaur® XP chemiluminescence system for screening of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis in Indian blood donors.

机构信息

Main Blood Centre, Dept. of Transfusion Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India.

Hemogenomics Pvt. Ltd., India.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2022 Apr;61(2):103318. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103318. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in blood donor screening has led to a gradual replacement of enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the former offers automation, higher sensitivity and lower turn-around-time. However, only a few CLIA platforms are used for blood donor screening in India. The present study evaluated one such newer platform viz., Adiva Centaur XP CLIA for screening of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective comparative study wherein 4843 whole blood donors were screened for HBsAg, Anti-HCV, HIV Ag-Ab and Anti-treponemal antibodies in both Advia Centaur XP and Architect i2000SR platforms. Additional tests were performed in samples which were reactive in only one of the platforms. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, false positive rate and false negative rate of both the platforms were compared. Kappa coefficient was calculated to determine the agreement between the testing platforms.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of Advia Centaur platform for HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis detection were 94.9 %, 100 %, 100 % and 100 % respectively as compared to 96.6 %, 100 %, 100 % and 100 % in Architect i2000SR platform. The specificity of both the platforms were 99.8-99.9 % for all the four tests. The agreement between the two platforms was almost perfect for HBV, HCV and syphilis testing; and fair for HIV testing.

CONCLUSION

The Advia Centaur CLIA platform was found to be comparable with the Architect CLIA platform for blood donor screening. Unexpected finding was the occurrence of HBV false negatives in both the platforms, possibly due to HBsAg mutations.

摘要

背景

化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)在血液筛查中的引入,使得其逐渐取代酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),因为前者具有自动化、更高的灵敏度和更短的周转时间。然而,在印度,只有少数 CLIA 平台用于血液筛查。本研究评估了一种较新的平台,即 Adiva Centaur XP CLIA,用于筛查乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和梅毒。

材料与方法

前瞻性对比研究,4843 份全血样本在 Advia Centaur XP 和 Architect i2000SR 平台上同时进行 HBsAg、抗-HCV、HIV Ag-Ab 和抗梅毒螺旋体抗体检测。仅在一个平台上反应的样本进行额外检测。比较两种平台的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性、假阳性率和假阴性率。计算 Kappa 系数以确定两种检测平台之间的一致性。

结果

与 Architect i2000SR 平台相比,Advia Centaur 平台对 HBV、HCV、HIV 和梅毒的检测灵敏度分别为 94.9%、100%、100%和 100%,特异性分别为 99.8%-99.9%。两种平台对所有四项检测的一致性均近乎完美,仅 HIV 检测的一致性为良好。

结论

Advia Centaur CLIA 平台在血液筛查方面与 Architect CLIA 平台相当。令人意外的发现是两种平台都出现了 HBV 假阴性,可能是由于 HBsAg 突变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验