Suppr超能文献

胃缺血预处理在食管切除术中减少吻合口漏和狭窄:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy reduces anastomotic leaks and strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5398-5407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08866-4. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) is a strategy to promote neovascularization of the gastric conduit to reduce the risk of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Despite a number of studies and reviews published on the concept of ischemic conditioning, there remains no clear consensus regarding its utility. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of GIC, particularly on anastomotic leaks, conduit ischemia, and strictures.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed on February 5th, 2020 by a university librarian after selection of key search terms with the research team. Inclusion criteria included human participants undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, age ≥ 18, N ≥ 5, and GIC performed prior to esophagectomy. Our primary outcome of interest was anastomotic leaks. Our secondary outcome was gastric conduit ischemia, anastomotic strictures, and overall survival. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1712 preliminary studies were identified and 23 studies included for final review. GIC was performed in 1178 (53.5%) patients. Meta-analysis revealed reduced odds of anastomotic leaks (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.97; I = 5%; p = 0.03) and anastomotic strictures (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.80; I = 65%; p = 0.005). Meta-analysis revealed no difference in odds of conduit ischemia (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.13-1.23; I = 0%; p = 0.11) and no difference in odds of overall survival (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.29-1.02; I = 22%; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

GIC is associated with reduced odds of anastomotic leaks and anastomotic strictures and may decrease morbidity in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to better identify the optimal patient population, timing, and techniques used to best achieve GIC.

摘要

背景

胃缺血预处理(GIC)是一种促进胃管新生血管形成的策略,可降低食管切除术后吻合口并发症的风险。尽管已经有许多关于缺血预处理概念的研究和综述发表,但对于其效用仍没有明确的共识。我们进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定 GIC 的影响,特别是在吻合口漏、管腔缺血和狭窄方面。

方法

在 2020 年 2 月 5 日,一位大学图书馆员根据研究团队选择的关键搜索词进行了系统搜索,搜索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library。纳入标准包括接受胃管重建的食管切除术患者,年龄≥18 岁,N≥5,以及在食管切除术前进行 GIC。我们感兴趣的主要结局是吻合口漏。次要结局是胃管腔缺血、吻合口狭窄和总生存率。使用 RevMan 5.4.1 进行荟萃分析,采用 Mantel-Haenszel 固定效应模型。

结果

共确定了 1712 项初步研究,其中 23 项研究进行了最终审查。1178 例(53.5%)患者接受了 GIC。荟萃分析显示,吻合口漏的可能性降低(OR 0.67;95%CI 0.46-0.97;I=5%;p=0.03)和吻合口狭窄(OR 0.48;95%CI 0.29-0.80;I=65%;p=0.005)。荟萃分析显示,管腔缺血的可能性没有差异(OR 0.40;95%CI 0.13-1.23;I=0%;p=0.11),总生存率的可能性也没有差异(OR 0.54;95%CI 0.29-1.02;I=22%;p=0.06)。

结论

GIC 与吻合口漏和吻合口狭窄的可能性降低相关,可能降低食管切除术患者的发病率。需要进一步的前瞻性随机试验来更好地确定最佳患者人群、最佳 GIC 实现的时间和技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验