Suppr超能文献

一项为期十年的四级新生儿重症监护病房微生物分离物和抗生素药敏性研究确定的败血症治疗选择。

Sepsis treatment options identified by 10-year study of microbial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility in a level-four neonatal intensive care unit.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Neonatal Department, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2022 Mar;111(3):519-526. doi: 10.1111/apa.16189. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

Abstract

AIM

This observational study investigated the microbiology of blood culture-positive sepsis episodes and susceptibility to empiric antibiotics in early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in a level-four neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2010 to 2019.

METHODS

It was based on patient records and data that Oslo University Hospital, Norway, routinely submitted to the Norwegian Neonatal Network database. Clinical data were merged with blood culture results, including antibiotic susceptibility.

RESULTS

We studied 5249 infants admitted to the NICU 6321 times and identified 324 positive blood cultures from 287 infants, with 30 EOS and 305 LOS episodes. Frequent causative agents for EOS were group B streptococci (33.3%), Escherichia coli (20.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (16.7%). All were susceptible to empiric ampicillin and gentamicin. LOS was most frequently caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) (73.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.7%) and Enterococci (6.9%). CONS, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella and Enterobacter represented 91.9% of LOS episodes and were susceptible to vancomycin and cefotaxime (96.1%), vancomycin and gentamicin (97.0%) and cloxacillin and gentamicin (38.1%).

CONCLUSION

Empiric treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin was adequate for EOS. Combining vancomycin and gentamicin may be a safer alternative to cefotaxime for LOS, as this reduces exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics.

摘要

目的

本观察性研究调查了 2010 年至 2019 年期间,四级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中血培养阳性败血症发作的微生物学特征,以及早发性败血症(EOS)和晚发性败血症(LOS)的经验性抗生素敏感性。

方法

该研究基于挪威奥斯陆大学医院向挪威新生儿网络数据库常规提交的患者记录和数据。临床数据与血培养结果(包括抗生素敏感性)合并。

结果

我们研究了 5249 名入住 NICU 的婴儿 6321 次,从 287 名婴儿中确定了 324 份阳性血培养,其中 30 份为 EOS,305 份为 LOS 发作。EOS 的常见病原体为 B 群链球菌(33.3%)、大肠杆菌(20.0%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(16.7%)。所有这些病原体对经验性氨苄西林和庆大霉素均敏感。LOS 最常见的病原体为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CONS)(73.8%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(15.7%)和肠球菌(6.9%)。CONS、金黄色葡萄球菌、肠球菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌和肠杆菌占 LOS 发作的 91.9%,对万古霉素和头孢噻肟(96.1%)、万古霉素和庆大霉素(97.0%)以及氯唑西林和庆大霉素(38.1%)敏感。

结论

氨苄西林和庆大霉素经验性治疗对 EOS 有效。对于 LOS,联合使用万古霉素和庆大霉素可能是头孢噻肟的更安全替代方案,因为这可减少广谱抗生素的暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验