Suppr超能文献

定义困难静脉通路(DIVA):一项系统综述。

Defining difficult intravenous access (DIVA): A systematic review.

作者信息

Bahl Amit, Johnson Steven, Alsbrooks Kimberly, Mares Alicia, Gala Smeet, Hoerauf Klaus

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Becton Dickinson and Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2021 Nov 17:11297298211059648. doi: 10.1177/11297298211059648.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The term "difficult intravenous access" (DIVA) is commonly used but not clearly defined. Repeated attempts at peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be a traumatic experience for patients, leading to sub-optimal clinical and economic outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to collate literature definitions of DIVA, with the aim of arriving at an evidence-driven definition.

METHODS

The SLR was designed to identify clinical, cost, and quality of life publications in patients requiring the insertion of a PIVC in any setting, including studies on US-guidance and/or guidewire, and studies with no specific intervention. The search was restricted to English language studies published between 1st January 2010 and 30th July 2020, and the Ovid platform was used to search several electronic databases, in addition to hand searching of clinical trial registries.

RESULTS

About 121 studies were included in the SLR, of which 64 reported on the objectives relevant to this manuscript. Prevalence estimates varied widely from 6% to 87.7% across 19 publications, reflecting differences in definitions used. Of 43 publications which provided a definition of DIVA, six key themes emerged. Of these, themes 1-3 (failed attempts at PIV access using traditional technique; based on physical examination findings for example no visible or palpable veins; and personal history of DIVA) were covered by all but one publication. Following a failed insertion attempt, the most common number of subsequent attempts was 3, and it was frequently reported that a more experienced clinician would attempt to gain access after multiple failed attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the themes identified, an evidence-driven definition of DIVA is proposed: "when a clinician has two or more failed attempts at PIV access using traditional techniques, physical examination findings are suggestive of DIVA (e.g. no visible or palpable veins) or the patient has a stated or documented history of DIVA."

摘要

背景

“困难静脉穿刺”(DIVA)这一术语常用但定义不明确。反复尝试外周静脉导管(PIVC)置入对患者来说可能是一种痛苦的经历,会导致不理想的临床和经济结果。我们进行了一项系统文献综述(SLR),以整理DIVA的文献定义,目的是得出一个基于证据的定义。

方法

该SLR旨在识别在任何环境下需要置入PIVC的患者的临床、成本和生活质量方面的出版物,包括关于超声引导和/或导丝的研究,以及无特定干预措施的研究。搜索仅限于2010年1月1日至2020年7月30日发表的英文研究,除了手动检索临床试验注册库外,还使用Ovid平台搜索了几个电子数据库。

结果

约121项研究纳入了该SLR,其中64项报告了与本文相关的目标。在19篇出版物中,患病率估计值差异很大,从6%到87.7%不等,反映了所使用定义的差异。在43篇给出DIVA定义的出版物中,出现了六个关键主题。其中,除一篇出版物外,所有出版物都涵盖了主题1 - 3(使用传统技术进行PIV穿刺失败;基于体格检查结果,例如无可见或可触及静脉;以及DIVA个人史)。在一次置入尝试失败后,后续尝试的最常见次数是3次,并且经常有报告称,在多次尝试失败后,经验更丰富的临床医生会尝试进行穿刺。

结论

考虑到所确定的主题,提出了一个基于证据的DIVA定义:“当临床医生使用传统技术进行PIV穿刺有两次或更多次失败尝试,体格检查结果提示DIVA(例如无可见或可触及静脉),或者患者有明确的或记录在案的DIVA病史时”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验