Ross Edgar, Katz Nathaniel P, Conaghan Philip G, Kivitz Alan, Turk Dennis C, Spitzer Andrew I, Jones Deryk G, Lanier Ryan K, Cinar Amy, Lufkin Joelle, Kelley Scott D
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Analgesic Solutions, 321 Commonwealth Rd, Wayland, MA, 01778, USA.
Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):289-302. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00335-z. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
A phase 3 randomized controlled study comparing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) to conventional TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) reported variable efficacy results. Enrollment criteria may have contributed to this discrepancy, as moderate-to-severe average daily pain (ADP) was required at baseline, whereas no limitations were placed on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A) pain severity. We conducted a post hoc sensitivity analysis to compare treatment effects in patients reporting moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain on both scales.
Participants > 40 years old with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to a single intra-articular injection of TA-ER 32 mg, TAcs 40 mg, or saline-placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Patient-reported ADP, WOMAC-A, rescue medication usage, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Participants who reported moderate-to-severe OA pain at baseline using both instruments (ADP ≥ 5 to ≤ 9, maximum 10 and WOMAC-A ≥ 2, maximum 4) were categorized as "concordant" pain reporters; patients with baseline moderate-to-severe OA on ADP only were termed "discordant" pain reporters.
Two-hundred-ninety-two concordant pain reporters of 484 total subjects received TA-ER 32 mg (n = 95), TAcs 40 mg (n = 100), or saline-placebo (n = 97). Baseline characteristics and AE profiles of the concordant and discordant pain responders were consistent with the full analysis population. Among concordant pain reporters, TA-ER significantly (p < 0.05) improved ADP scores vs. TAcs (weeks 5-19; area-under-the-effect [AUE]; AUE) and saline-placebo (weeks 1-20; AUE; AUE). At week 12, a higher proportion reported no knee pain (ADP = 0) with TA-ER (~ 28%) vs. TAcs (~ 8%). TA-ER significantly improved WOMAC-A vs. TAcs at weeks 4, 8, and 12, with significant reduction in rescue medication usage observed with TA-ER from weeks 2 to 20 vs. TAcs.
In patients reporting moderate-to-severe knee OA pain at baseline based on concordant ADP and WOMAC-A scores, TA-ER provided statistically significant pain relief for ≥ 12 weeks compared with conventional TAcs.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357459.
一项3期随机对照研究比较了曲安奈德缓释剂(TA-ER)与传统曲安奈德结晶悬液(TAcs),报告了不同的疗效结果。入组标准可能导致了这种差异,因为基线时要求有中度至重度的平均每日疼痛(ADP),而对西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC-A)的疼痛严重程度没有限制。我们进行了一项事后敏感性分析,以比较在两个量表上均报告有中度至重度骨关节炎(OA)疼痛的患者的治疗效果。
年龄>40岁的有症状膝关节OA患者被随机分配接受一次关节内注射32mg的TA-ER、40mg的TAcs或生理盐水安慰剂,并随访24周。评估患者报告的ADP、WOMAC-A评分、急救药物使用情况和不良事件(AE)。在基线时使用两种工具均报告有中度至重度OA疼痛(ADP≥5至≤9,最大值为10,WOMAC-A≥2,最大值为4)的参与者被归类为“一致”疼痛报告者;仅在ADP上有基线中度至重度OA的患者被称为“不一致”疼痛报告者。
484名受试者中有292名一致疼痛报告者接受了32mg的TA-ER(n = 95)、40mg的TAcs(n = 100)或生理盐水安慰剂(n = 97)。一致和不一致疼痛反应者的基线特征和AE情况与全分析人群一致。在一致疼痛报告者中,与TAcs(第5 - 19周;效应下面积[AUE])和生理盐水安慰剂(第1 - 20周;AUE)相比,TA-ER显著(p < 0.05)改善了ADP评分。在第12周时,与TAcs(约8%)相比,接受TA-ER的患者中报告无膝关节疼痛(ADP = 0)的比例更高(约28%)。与TAcs相比,TA-ER在第4、8和12周时显著改善了WOMAC-A评分,并且在第2至20周时,与TAcs相比,TA-ER显著减少了急救药物的使用。
在基于一致的ADP和WOMAC-A评分在基线时报告有中度至重度膝关节OA疼痛的患者中,与传统的TAcs相比,TA-ER在≥12周的时间内提供了具有统计学意义的疼痛缓解。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02357459。