• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型血管内超声和光学相干断层成像系统在冠状动脉内成像的首次人体评估。

First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):686-698. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30001. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30001
PMID:34792273
Abstract

AIMS

We evaluated the first in-human performance of a novel hybrid imaging catheter that permits simultaneous and co-registered acquisition of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 17 patients undergoing planned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were imaged between August 2018 and August 2019. Eleven patients with both pre- and post-PCI IVUS and OCT images were included in the offline image analysis. IVUS and OCT images were analyzed separately then together with co-registered images for pre-stent findings, and only separately for post-stent findings. A total of 926 frames were analyzed (218 pre-PCI, 708 post-PCI). There was substantial agreement to detect calcific plaque between co-registered IVUS-OCT and standalone IVUS (Kappa 0.72 [0.65-0.79]) and standalone OCT (Kappa 0.75 [0.68-0.81]) while standalone imaging modalities showed lower agreement to detect lipidic and fibrotic plaques compared with co-registered IVUS-OCT. There were more frames with stent underexpansion on IVUS than OCT [72 (28.7%) vs. 58 (23.1%), respectively, p = 0.039]. Detection rates of incomplete stent apposition (present on 20 OCT frames vs. 2 IVUS frames, p < 0.001) and tissue protrusion (40 vs. 27 frames, p < 0.001) were higher on OCT than IVUS. One stent edge dissection was detected in the image analysis and was seen on OCT but not IVUS. All 177 frames with image artifacts contained at least one co-registered imaging modality with interpretable diagnostic content. There were no study device-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid image acquisition was safe. The availability of both IVUS and OCT changed image interpretation compared to either modality alone, suggesting a complementary role of these two techniques.

摘要

目的

我们评估了一种新型混合成像导管的首次人体性能,该导管允许同时和共注册采集血管内超声(IVUS)和光相干断层扫描(OCT)图像。

方法和结果

2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月期间,共对 17 例计划行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者进行了成像。对 11 例患者进行了 PCI 前后 IVUS 和 OCT 图像的离线图像分析。分别分析 IVUS 和 OCT 图像,然后与共注册图像一起分析支架前发现,仅分别分析支架后发现。共分析了 926 帧(218 个 PCI 前,708 个 PCI 后)。与单独的 IVUS 和 OCT 相比,共注册的 IVUS-OCT 在检测钙化斑块方面具有显著一致性(Kappa 0.72 [0.65-0.79])和单独的 OCT(Kappa 0.75 [0.68-0.81]),而单独的成像方式与共注册的 IVUS-OCT 相比,对脂质斑块和纤维斑块的检测一致性较低。IVUS 上显示支架扩张不足的帧数多于 OCT [分别为 72 帧(28.7%)和 58 帧(23.1%),p=0.039]。OCT 上检测到不完全支架贴壁(20 个 OCT 帧和 2 个 IVUS 帧,p<0.001)和组织突出(40 个和 27 个帧,p<0.001)的检出率高于 IVUS。图像分析中检测到 1 例支架边缘夹层,OCT 上可见,但 IVUS 上未见。所有 177 帧图像伪影均至少包含一种可解释诊断内容的共注册成像方式。无研究器械相关不良事件。

结论

混合图像采集是安全的。与单独使用任何一种模态相比,同时使用 IVUS 和 OCT 改变了图像解释,这表明这两种技术具有互补作用。

相似文献

1
First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.新型血管内超声和光学相干断层成像系统在冠状动脉内成像的首次人体评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):686-698. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30001. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).光学相干断层成像指导支架扩张与血管内超声的比较:ILUMIEN II 研究(血流储备分数 [FFR] 和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的光学相干断层成像 [OCT] 观察性研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024.
3
Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.频域光相干断层成像术评价无保护左主干冠状动脉病变——与血管内超声的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):E173-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24843. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
4
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
5
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.光学相干断层扫描与血管内超声在评估支架植入评估中观察者变异性和可靠性的对比:OCTIVUS研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):229-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25854. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.光学频域成像与血管内超声在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较(OPINION 试验):OPINION 成像研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):111-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.频域光学相干断层扫描与血管内超声在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中作为指导的比较实用性
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Apr;29(2):216-24. doi: 10.1111/joic.12276. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.血管内超声、光学相干断层成像和血管造影指导下支架置入的长期疗效比较:Meta 分析。
Angiology. 2024 Oct;75(9):809-819. doi: 10.1177/00033197231198674. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内成像指导与血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5.
10
Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization.血管内超声(IVUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后优化过程中医师决策的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:96-98. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Technological Innovations and Clinical Implications in Cardiology.冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描:心脏病学中的技术创新与临床意义
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2025;27(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11936-025-01103-4. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
A Multicenter Feasibility and Safety Study of a Novel Hybrid IVUS-OCT Imaging System.一种新型血管内超声-光学相干断层扫描混合成像系统的多中心可行性与安全性研究。
JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 1):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.01.009.
3
Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Intravascular Imaging: From Pathophysiology to Improving Outcomes.
利用血管内成像技术揭开急性冠脉综合征的奥秘:从病理生理学到改善预后
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 23;13(23):7087. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237087.
4
Emerging Hybrid Intracoronary Imaging Technologies and Their Applications in Clinical Practice and Research.新兴的冠状动脉混合成像技术及其在临床实践和研究中的应用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep 9;17(17):1963-1979. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.07.007.
5
Invasive Coronary Imaging Assessment for Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: State-of-the-Art Review.心脏移植血管病变的有创冠状动脉成像评估:最新综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 13;1(4):100344. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100344. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
6
Intracoronary Imaging: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.冠状动脉内成像:当前实践与未来展望。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 2;24(2):39. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2402039. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group.临床定量冠状动脉狭窄与冠状动脉粥样硬化成像:来自定量心血管成像研究组的共识声明
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Oct;20(10):696-714. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00880-4. Epub 2023 Jun 5.