MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Nov 19;70(46):1613-1616. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7046a5.
Surges in COVID-19 cases have stressed hospital systems, negatively affected health care and public health infrastructures, and degraded national critical functions (1,2). Resource limitations, such as available hospital space, staffing, and supplies led some facilities to adopt crisis standards of care, the most extreme operating condition for hospitals, in which the focus of medical decision-making shifted from achieving the best outcomes for individual patients to addressing the immediate care needs of larger groups of patients (3). When hospitals deviated from conventional standards of care, many preventive and elective procedures were suspended, leading to the progression of serious conditions among some persons who would have benefitted from earlier diagnosis and intervention (4). During March-May 2020, U.S. emergency department visits declined by 23% for heart attacks, 20% for strokes, and 10% for diabetic emergencies (5). The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) COVID Task Force* examined the relationship between hospital strain and excess deaths during July 4, 2020-July 10, 2021, to assess the impact of COVID-19 surges on hospital system operations and potential effects on other critical infrastructure sectors and national critical functions. The study period included the months during which the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant became predominant in the United States. The negative binomial regression model used to calculate estimated deaths predicted that, if intensive care unit (ICU) bed use nationwide reached 75% capacity an estimated 12,000 additional excess deaths would occur nationally over the next 2 weeks. As hospitals exceed 100% ICU bed capacity, 80,000 excess deaths would be expected in the following 2 weeks. This analysis indicates the importance of controlling case growth and subsequent hospitalizations before severe strain. State, local, tribal, and territorial leaders could evaluate ways to reduce strain on public health and health care infrastructures, including implementing interventions to reduce overall disease prevalence such as vaccination and other prevention strategies, as well as ways to expand or enhance capacity during times of high disease prevalence.
新冠疫情病例的激增使医院系统不堪重负,对医疗保健和公共卫生基础设施产生负面影响,并降低了国家关键功能(1,2)。资源限制,如可用的医院空间、人员配备和物资,导致一些设施采用了危机护理标准,这是医院最极端的运作条件,在此条件下,医疗决策的重点从为个体患者实现最佳结果转移到解决更大患者群体的即时护理需求(3)。当医院偏离常规护理标准时,许多预防和选择性手术被暂停,导致一些本可以从早期诊断和干预中受益的患者病情恶化(4)。2020 年 3 月至 5 月,美国急诊科因心脏病发作的就诊量下降了 23%,因中风下降了 20%,因糖尿病急症下降了 10%(5)。网络安全和基础设施安全局(CISA)新冠疫情工作组*审查了 2020 年 7 月 4 日至 2021 年 7 月 10 日期间医院压力与超额死亡之间的关系,以评估新冠疫情激增对医院系统运作的影响,以及对其他关键基础设施部门和国家关键功能的潜在影响。研究期间包括在美国高度传播的 SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2(Delta)变体占主导地位的几个月。用于计算估计死亡人数的负二项回归模型预测,如果全国重症监护病房(ICU)床位使用率达到 75%,预计未来两周全国将额外增加 1.2 万例超额死亡。随着医院 ICU 床位使用率超过 100%,预计未来两周将有 8 万例超额死亡。这项分析表明,在严重压力之前,控制病例增长和随后的住院治疗非常重要。州、地方、部落和地区领导人可以评估如何减轻公共卫生和医疗保健基础设施的压力,包括实施减少疾病总体流行率的干预措施,如接种疫苗和其他预防策略,以及在疾病流行率高时扩大或增强能力的方法。