Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (J.H.B., L.K.).
BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (C.A., K.F.D., M.C.P., P.S.J., J.J.V.M.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;14(12):e008837. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008837. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Effective therapies for HFrEF usually reduce NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, and it is important to establish whether new treatments are effective across the range of NT-proBNP.
We evaluated both these questions in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) trial. Patients in New York Heart Association functional class II to IV with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and a NT-proBNP level ≥600 pg/mL (≥600 ng/L; ≥400 pg/mL if hospitalized for HF within the previous 12 months or ≥900 pg/mL if atrial fibrillation/flutter) were eligible. The primary outcome was the composite of an episode of worsening HF or cardiovascular death.
Of the 4744 randomized patients, 4742 had an available baseline NT-proBNP measurement (median, 1437 pg/mL [interquartile range, 857-2650 pg/mL]). Compared with placebo, treatment with dapagliflozin significantly reduced NT-proBNP from baseline to 8 months (absolute least-squares mean reduction, -303 pg/mL [95% CI, -457 to -150 pg/mL]; geometric mean ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.96]). Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death, irrespective of baseline NT-proBNP quartile; the hazard ratio for dapagliflozin versus placebo, from lowest to highest quartile was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.27-0.67), 0.77 (0.56-1.04), 0.78 (0.60-1.01), and 0.78 (0.64-0.95); for interaction=0.09. Consistent benefits were observed for all-cause mortality. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin increased the proportion of patients with a meaningful improvement (≥5 points) in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score ( for interaction=0.99) and decreased the proportion with a deterioration ≥5 points ( for interaction=0.87) across baseline NT-proBNP quartiles.
In patients with HFrEF, dapagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP by 300 pg/mL after 8 months of treatment compared with placebo. In addition, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF and death, and improved symptoms, across the spectrum of baseline NT-proBNP levels included in DAPA-HF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03036124.
有效的 HFrEF 治疗方法通常会降低 NT-proBNP(氨基末端 B 型利钠肽前体)水平,因此,确定新的治疗方法是否在整个 NT-proBNP 范围内有效非常重要。
我们在 DAPA-HF(达格列净预防心力衰竭恶化的临床试验)中评估了这两个问题。符合条件的患者为纽约心脏协会心功能 II 至 IV 级,左心室射血分数≤40%,NT-proBNP 水平≥600pg/mL(如果心力衰竭住院前 12 个月内为≥600ng/L;如果心房颤动/扑动为≥900pg/mL)。主要结局为恶化性心力衰竭或心血管死亡的复合事件。
在 4744 名随机患者中,4742 名患者有基线 NT-proBNP 测量值(中位数为 1437pg/mL[四分位距为 857-2650pg/mL])。与安慰剂相比,达格列净治疗可显著降低 8 个月时的 NT-proBNP(绝对最小二乘均值降低 303pg/mL[95%CI,-457 至-150pg/mL];几何均数比值为 0.92[95%CI,0.88-0.96])。无论基线 NT-proBNP 四分位如何,达格列净均降低了恶化性心力衰竭或心血管死亡的风险;达格列净与安慰剂相比的风险比,从最低到最高四分位数分别为 0.43(95%CI,0.27-0.67)、0.77(0.56-1.04)、0.78(0.60-1.01)和 0.78(0.64-0.95);交互作用 P=0.09。全因死亡率也观察到一致的益处。与安慰剂相比,达格列净增加了 Kansas City 心肌病问卷总症状评分(≥5 分)有显著改善的患者比例(交互作用 P=0.99),降低了恶化≥5 分的患者比例(交互作用 P=0.87),跨越了基线 NT-proBNP 四分位。
在 HFrEF 患者中,与安慰剂相比,达格列净治疗 8 个月后 NT-proBNP 降低了 300pg/mL。此外,达格列净降低了恶化性心力衰竭和死亡的风险,并改善了症状,跨越了 DAPA-HF 纳入的基线 NT-proBNP 水平谱。