Rich Shannan N, Prosperi Mattia, Klann Emily M, Codreanu Pavel T, Cook Robert L, Turley Melissa K
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Student Health Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 16;8(11):ofab482. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab482. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Acute pharyngitis is a frequent illness presenting in outpatient settings. Antibiotics are only recommended for bacterial pharyngitis caused by group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GAS); however, infections with non-group A β-hemolytic streptococci (NGAS) have similar clinical presentations and are common in young adult populations. The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of a current (expert) diagnostic algorithm for GAS pharyngitis, the Centor score, and compare it to alternative models developed to predict GAS and NGAS in a college student population.
Electronic health records were obtained for all patients who received a streptococcal rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and/or a bacterial throat culture (n = 3963) at a southeastern US university in 2014. Bivariate and multivariable regression models (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO] and stepwise-selected) were fitted to assess and compare their diagnostic performances for GAS-positive and NGAS-positive infections.
Prevalence of GAS was 18.8%. In the subset of RADT-negative patients who received bacterial throat cultures (n = 313), growth of NGAS occurred in 34.8%, with group C streptococci the most frequent isolate. Mean Centor score was higher for NGAS (3.2) vs GAS (2.9) infections ( = .0111). The area under the curve (AUC) for GAS prediction was 0.64 using the Centor score and 0.70 using the LASSO model. For NGAS, the most important features were cough, pharyngeal erythema, tonsillar exudate, and gastrointestinal symptoms (AUC = 0.63).
GAS and NGAS pharyngitis were indistinguishable among college students in this study utilizing a commonly applied decision score. Alternative models using additional clinical criteria may be useful for supporting diagnosis of this common illness.
急性咽炎是门诊常见疾病。抗生素仅推荐用于由A组β溶血性链球菌(GAS)引起的细菌性咽炎;然而,非A组β溶血性链球菌(NGAS)感染具有相似的临床表现,且在年轻成年人群中很常见。本研究的目的是分析当前用于GAS咽炎的(专家)诊断算法即Centor评分的性能,并将其与为预测大学生人群中GAS和NGAS而开发的替代模型进行比较。
获取了2014年在美国东南部一所大学接受链球菌快速抗原检测(RADT)和/或细菌咽喉培养的所有患者的电子健康记录(n = 3963)。拟合双变量和多变量回归模型(最小绝对收缩和选择算子[LASSO]及逐步选择)以评估和比较它们对GAS阳性和NGAS阳性感染的诊断性能。
GAS的患病率为18.8%。在接受细菌咽喉培养的RADT阴性患者亚组(n = 313)中,NGAS生长率为34.8%,其中C组链球菌是最常见的分离株。NGAS感染(3.2)的平均Centor评分高于GAS感染(2.9)(P = 0.0111)。使用Centor评分预测GAS的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.64,使用LASSO模型为0.70。对于NGAS,最重要的特征是咳嗽、咽部红斑、扁桃体渗出物和胃肠道症状(AUC = 0.63)。
在本研究中,利用常用的决策评分,大学生中的GAS和NGAS咽炎难以区分。使用额外临床标准的替代模型可能有助于支持对这种常见疾病的诊断。