Pediatric Neonatology, Nemours Children's Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022;15(2):297-302. doi: 10.3233/NPM-210798.
There are three different approaches set forth by the Committee on the Fetus and Newborn (COFN) for managing asymptomatic neonates born to mothers with inadequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for early-onset Group B Strep (GBS) infection. The first approach is that of categorical risk factor assessments, and recommends that asymptomatic infants born to afebrile mothers with inadequate IAP for GBS be monitored with clinical observation for 36-48 hours. The second approach recommends serial physical examinations and vital signs for 36-48 hours to closely monitor changes in clinical condition for all patients. The Kaiser Permanente EOS risk calculator (SRC) is an example of the third approach, a multivariate risk assessment, and it takes into consideration several perinatal risk factors. This multivariate risk assessment then provides recommendations for reassessment and management based on presume risk of the infant developing or having Early Onset Sepsis (EOS). The aim of our study was to compare these three recently published recommendations from the COFN for the management of asymptomatic neonates born to afebrile mothers with inadequate IAP for GBS.
This is a retrospective study of asymptomatic neonates with gestational age ≥35 weeks born to afebrile mothers with indicated inadequate IAP for GBS between April 2017 and July 2020. Management recommendations of the SRC were compared to the recommendations of categorical risk assessment and risk assessment based on clinical condition.
A total of 7,396 infants were born during the study period, 394 (5.3%. to mothers with inadequate IAP. Recommendations for these infants according to both the categorical risk factor guideline and the clinical condition guideline include extended, close observation. However, the SRC recommended routine newborn care for 99.7%.f these infants. None of the infants developed EOS.
The SRC recommend routine neonatal care without enhanced and prolonged observation for nearly all asymptomatic infants born to afebrile mothers with inadequate IAP. As none of the infants in this cohort had EOS, further studies in a larger cohort are needed to establish the safety of SRC in neonates born to mothers with inadequate IAP.
针对母亲在产程中未接受足够的抗生素预防(IAP)而导致新生儿发生早发性 B 组链球菌(GBS)感染的无症状新生儿,胎儿与新生儿委员会(COFN)提出了三种不同的处理方法。第一种方法是对有明确危险因素的病例进行评估,建议对无发热且 IAP 不足的无症状 GBS 感染新生儿,采用临床观察的方式进行 36-48 小时监测。第二种方法建议对所有患者连续进行体格检查和生命体征监测 36-48 小时,密切监测临床状况的变化。Kaiser Permanente EOS 风险计算器(SRC)是第三种方法的一个例子,即多变量风险评估,它考虑了几个围产期风险因素。然后,这种多变量风险评估会根据婴儿发生或患有早发性败血症(EOS)的假定风险,为重新评估和管理提供建议。我们的研究旨在比较 COFN 最近发布的这三种针对母亲在产程中未接受足够的 GBS 抗生素预防而导致新生儿发生早发性败血症(EOS)的无症状新生儿处理建议。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2017 年 4 月至 2020 年 7 月期间,出生胎龄≥35 周且母亲在产程中未接受足够的 GBS 抗生素预防的无症状新生儿。将 SRC 的管理建议与基于风险因素的分类评估和基于临床情况的风险评估的建议进行了比较。
研究期间共出生了 7396 名婴儿,其中 394 名(5.3%)婴儿的母亲在产程中未接受足够的 IAP。根据分类风险因素指南和临床情况指南,这些婴儿的处理建议包括延长和密切观察。然而,SRC 建议对 99.7%的此类婴儿进行常规新生儿护理。没有婴儿发生 EOS。
SRC 建议对几乎所有出生于未接受足够 IAP 的母亲的无症状新生儿进行常规新生儿护理,而无需增强和延长观察。由于本队列中没有婴儿发生 EOS,因此需要在更大的队列中进一步研究,以确定 SRC 在未接受足够 IAP 的母亲所生新生儿中的安全性。