Song Kyeongtak, Jang Jaeho, Nolte Tiffanie, Wikstrom Erik A
Sports Medicine Research Institute, Department of Athletic Training & Clinical Nutrition, University of Kentucky, United States.
MOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise & Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Jan;53:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
The purpose of this review with meta-analyses was to determine the dynamic reach differences 1) between chronic ankle instability (CAI) and uninjured individuals, 2) between the limbs of an individual with CAI, and 3) between the uninvolved CAI limb and the healthy control limb across all possible reach directions of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).
PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus databases were searched up to October 2021. Data were extracted from the retained studies and underwent methodological quality assessment and meta-analysis using random-effect models.
After screening, 33 articles were included for the analyses. In all possible SEBT reach directions, the CAI group demonstrated significantly decreased normalized dynamic reach distances relative to the uninjured control group (SMDs: -0.66 to -0.48, p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, the involved CAI limb demonstrated significantly decreased normalized dynamic reach distances relative to the uninvolved CAI limb (SMDs: -0.61 to -0.33, p ≤ 0.05). However, no differences were noted between the uninvolved CAI limb and the healthy control limb (SMDs: -0.22 to 0.09, p ≥ 0.13).
Our findings were that the involved limb of those with CAI has dynamic postural deficits relative to (i) an uninjured control group and (ii) relative to their uninvolved limb. However, the uninvolved limb of the CAI group does not differ from an uninjured control group in any reach direction.
本综述及荟萃分析的目的是确定慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者与未受伤个体之间、CAI患者双侧肢体之间以及在星标偏移平衡测试(SEBT)所有可能的伸展方向上,CAI未受累肢体与健康对照肢体之间的动态伸展差异。
检索了截至2021年10月的PubMed、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus和Scopus数据库。从纳入的研究中提取数据,并使用随机效应模型进行方法学质量评估和荟萃分析。
筛选后,纳入33篇文章进行分析。在SEBT所有可能的伸展方向上,CAI组相对于未受伤对照组的标准化动态伸展距离显著降低(标准化均数差:-0.66至-0.48,p≤0.05)。同样,CAI受累肢体相对于未受累肢体的标准化动态伸展距离显著降低(标准化均数差:-0.61至-0.33,p≤0.05)。然而,CAI未受累肢体与健康对照肢体之间未发现差异(标准化均数差:-0.22至0.09,p≥0.13)。
我们的研究结果表明,CAI患者的受累肢体相对于(i)未受伤对照组和(ii)其未受累肢体存在动态姿势缺陷。然而,CAI组的未受累肢体在任何伸展方向上与未受伤对照组均无差异。