Requena-Ibáñez Juan Antonio, Santos-Gallego Carlos García, Rodriguez Cordero Anderly José, Fardman Brian, Sartori Samantha, Sanz Javier, Fuster Valentin, Badimon Juan José
Atherothrombosis Research Unit, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA; Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA.
Atherothrombosis Research Unit, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA; Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb;86:149-151. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
Epicardial Adipose Tissue (EAT) is drawing increasing attention. As a quantifiable, modifiable, and potentially new cardiovascular therapeutic target, its accurate measurement is particularly relevant. In Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) different methods can be used to assess EAT burden. We take advantage of CMR-studies of EMPATROPISM trial to assess EAT through three different methods, evaluate the effect of Empagliflozin and look for significant difference in the ability to detect changes in serial measurements. In some settings such as treatment-induced changes or patient follow-up, multi-slice method of EAT evaluation provides higher accuracy to detect significant differences, otherwise unnoticed by single-slice approaches.
心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)正受到越来越多的关注。作为一个可量化、可调节且可能的新的心血管治疗靶点,对其进行准确测量尤为重要。在心脏磁共振成像(CMR)中,可以使用不同的方法来评估EAT负荷。我们利用EMPA-REG OUTCOME试验的CMR研究,通过三种不同方法评估EAT,评估恩格列净的效果,并寻找在检测系列测量变化能力方面的显著差异。在某些情况下,如治疗引起的变化或患者随访,EAT评估的多层方法在检测显著差异方面提供了更高的准确性,而单层面方法可能会忽略这些差异。