Seth Saona, Jhulki Samik
Department of Applied Sciences, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam 784028, India.
Mater Horiz. 2021 Mar 1;8(3):700-727. doi: 10.1039/d0mh01710h. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Porous crystalline frameworks including zeolites, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) have attracted great research interest in recent years. In addition to their assembly in the solid-state being fundamentally interesting and aesthetically pleasing, their potential applications have now pervaded in different areas of chemistry, biology and materials science. When framework materials are endowed with 'flexibility', they exhibit some properties (e.g., stimuli-induced pore breathing and reversible phase transformations) that are distinct from their rigid counterparts. Benefiting from flexibility and porosity, these framework materials have shown promise in applications that include separation of toxic chemicals, isotopes and hydrocarbons, sensing, and targeted delivery of chemicals. While flexibility in MOFs has been widely appreciated, recent developments of COFs and HOFs have established that flexibility is not just limited to MOFs. In fact, zeolites-that are considered rigid when compared with MOFs-are also known to exhibit dynamic modes. Despite flexibility may be conceived as being detrimental to the formation and stability of periodic structures, the landscape of flexible framework structures continues to expand with discovery of new materials with promising applications. In this review, we make an account of different flexible framework materials based on their framework types with a more focus on recent examples and delve into the origin of flexibility in each case. This systematic analysis of different flexibility types based on their origins enables understanding of structure-property relationships, which should help guide future development of flexible framework materials based on appropriate monomer design and tailoring their properties by bottom-up approach. In essence, this review provides a summary of different flexibility types extant to framework materials and critical analysis of importance of flexibility in emerging applications.
包括沸石、金属有机框架材料(MOF)、共价有机框架材料(COF)和氢键有机框架材料(HOF)在内的多孔晶体框架近年来引起了极大的研究兴趣。除了它们在固态下的组装从根本上有趣且美观之外,它们的潜在应用现在已经渗透到化学、生物学和材料科学的不同领域。当框架材料具有“柔性”时,它们会表现出一些与其刚性对应物不同的特性(例如,刺激诱导的孔隙呼吸和可逆相变)。受益于柔性和孔隙率,这些框架材料在包括有毒化学品、同位素和碳氢化合物的分离、传感以及化学品的靶向递送等应用中显示出前景。虽然MOF中的柔性已得到广泛认可,但COF和HOF的最新进展表明,柔性不仅限于MOF。事实上,与MOF相比被认为是刚性的沸石也已知表现出动态模式。尽管柔性可能被认为对周期性结构的形成和稳定性有害,但随着具有有前景应用的新材料的发现,柔性框架结构的领域仍在不断扩大。在这篇综述中,我们根据框架类型对不同的柔性框架材料进行了介绍,更侧重于近期的例子,并深入探讨了每种情况下柔性的起源。基于起源对不同柔性类型进行的这种系统分析有助于理解结构-性能关系,这应该有助于通过适当的单体设计和自下而上的方法调整其性能来指导柔性框架材料的未来发展。本质上,这篇综述总结了框架材料现存的不同柔性类型,并对柔性在新兴应用中的重要性进行了批判性分析。