• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与其他饮食障碍亚型相比,清除障碍在症状学和人格连续体上位于何处?对 DSM 的启示。

Where does purging disorder lie on the symptomatologic and personality continuum when compared to other eating disorder subtypes? Implications for the DSM.

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ciber Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Jan;30(1):36-49. doi: 10.1002/erv.2872. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1002/erv.2872
PMID:34825434
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical significance and distinctiveness of purging disorder (PD) from other eating disorder (ED) diagnoses.

METHOD

Participants included 3127 women consecutively admitted to an ED treatment centre (246 PD, 465 anorexia nervosa restrictive [AN-R], 327 AN-binge purging [AN-BP], 1436 bulimia nervosa [BN], 360 binge eating disorder [BED], 177 atypical AN and 116 unspecified feeding or eating disorder [UFED]) who were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria. Additionally, 822 control participants were recruited from the community. All participants completed measures assessing ED symptoms (EDI-2), general psychopathology (SCL-90-R) and personality (TCI-R).

RESULTS

Patients with PD, when compared to controls, scored significantly higher on the EDI-2 and SCL-90-R, and most TCI-R dimensions. Most of the significant differences between PD and the other ED diagnoses emerged between PD and AN-R, followed by Atypical-AN, UFED, AN-BP and BED, with patients with PD typically reporting higher scores on the EDI-2 and SCL-90-R subscales. Significant differences between PD and BN were also present, but to a lesser extent. The findings for personality varied amongst the different ED diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

PD is a clinically significant disorder, which seems to be more similar to BN than it is to AN and the other ED subtypes.

摘要

目的

评估清除障碍(PD)与其他饮食障碍(ED)诊断的临床意义和独特性。

方法

参与者包括 3127 名连续入住 ED 治疗中心的女性(246 名 PD、465 名神经性厌食症限制型[AN-R]、327 名 AN 暴食清除型[AN-BP]、1436 名神经性贪食症[BN]、360 名暴食障碍[BED]、177 名非典型 AN 和 116 名未指定的进食或饮食障碍[UFED]),他们根据 DSM-5 标准进行了诊断。此外,还从社区招募了 822 名对照参与者。所有参与者都完成了评估 ED 症状(EDI-2)、一般心理病理(SCL-90-R)和人格(TCI-R)的量表。

结果

与对照组相比,PD 患者在 EDI-2 和 SCL-90-R 以及大多数 TCI-R 维度上的得分显著更高。PD 与其他 ED 诊断之间的大多数显著差异出现在 PD 与 AN-R 之间,其次是不典型 AN、UFED、AN-BP 和 BED,PD 患者通常在 EDI-2 和 SCL-90-R 子量表上的得分更高。PD 与 BN 之间也存在显著差异,但程度较轻。人格方面的发现因不同的 ED 诊断而有所不同。

结论

PD 是一种具有临床意义的障碍,它似乎与 BN 更为相似,而不是与 AN 和其他 ED 亚型相似。

相似文献

1
Where does purging disorder lie on the symptomatologic and personality continuum when compared to other eating disorder subtypes? Implications for the DSM.与其他饮食障碍亚型相比,清除障碍在症状学和人格连续体上位于何处?对 DSM 的启示。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Jan;30(1):36-49. doi: 10.1002/erv.2872. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
Drive for thinness provides an alternative, more meaningful, severity indicator than the DSM-5 severity indices for eating disorders.追求苗条身材为进食障碍提供了一个比 DSM-5 严重程度指标更有意义的替代严重程度指标。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):482-498. doi: 10.1002/erv.2776. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
There is nothing as inconsistent as the OSFED diagnostic criteria.OSFED 的诊断标准前后不一,自相矛盾。
Trends Mol Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Impairments among DSM-5 eating disorders: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中饮食失调症的损害:一项系统评价与多层次荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr;101:102267. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102267. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
5
Comparing ICD-11 and DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED-Quest).将国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)的饮食失调诊断与慕尼黑饮食和喂养障碍问卷(ED-Quest)进行比较。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Sep;56(9):1826-1831. doi: 10.1002/eat.24010. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Differentiating purging and nonpurging bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder.区分清泻型与非清泻型神经性贪食症和暴食障碍。
Int J Eat Disord. 2011 Sep;44(6):488-96. doi: 10.1002/eat.20823. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
7
Suicide attempts in eating disorder subtypes: a meta-analysis of the literature employing DSM-IV, DSM-5, or ICD-10 diagnostic criteria.进食障碍亚型中的自杀尝试:采用 DSM-IV、DSM-5 或 ICD-10 诊断标准的文献荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1237-1249. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003549. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Examining the placement of atypical anorexia nervosa in the eating disorder diagnostic hierarchy relative to bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder.研究非典型神经性厌食症在进食障碍诊断层级中相对于神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食症的位置。
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):839-847. doi: 10.1002/eat.24122. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
9
A proposed trumping scheme for other specified feeding or eating disorder: Comment on Walsh et al., 2023.一种针对其他特定进食或喂养障碍的拟议优先方案:对沃尔什等人(2023年)的评论
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr;56(4):835-837. doi: 10.1002/eat.23906. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
Food addiction in anorexia nervosa: Implications for the understanding of crossover diagnosis.神经性厌食症中的食物成瘾:对跨诊断理解的影响。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 May;30(3):278-288. doi: 10.1002/erv.2897. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review on the Neurocognitive Profiles in Eating Disorders and Higher Weight Individuals: Insights for Targeted Interventions.饮食失调和超重个体的神经认知特征叙事综述:针对性干预的见解
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4418. doi: 10.3390/nu16244418.
2
Comparison among anorexia nervosa adolescents with or without previous overweight, obese, and healthy adolescents.有或无超重病史的神经性厌食症青少年、肥胖青少年与健康青少年之间的比较。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 21;15:1438829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1438829. eCollection 2024.
3
Examining negative urgency as a predictor of eating disorder maintenance in purging syndromes.
考察消极紧迫感作为暴食障碍维持的预测因子。
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;80(7):1607-1617. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23683. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
4
Understanding community provider practices in diagnosing and treating atypical anorexia nervosa: A mixed methods study.了解社区医疗服务提供者诊断和治疗非典型神经性厌食症的实践:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):892-902. doi: 10.1002/eat.24125. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Baseline presentation of atypical anorexia nervosa in Singaporean adolescents: a retrospective cohort study.新加坡青少年非典型神经性厌食症的基线表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Eat Disord. 2023 Dec 8;11(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00943-4.
6
Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long-term follow-up.通过与神经性贪食症进行长期随访比较来评估清除障碍的预测效度。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Jun;55(6):810-819. doi: 10.1002/eat.23712. Epub 2022 Apr 2.