Suppr超能文献

初次髋关节和膝关节置换手术后的决策后悔

Decision regret after primary hip and knee replacement surgery.

作者信息

Cassidy Roslyn S, Bennett Damien B, Beverland David E, O'Brien Seamus

机构信息

Outcomes Unit, Primary Joint Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, UK.

Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jan;28(1):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision regret (DR) is a recognised patient centered outcome measure following a therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to measure DR following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), to assess for differences between these patients and explore possible contributory factors.

METHOD

DR was measured using the DR scale in a group of THA and TKA patients, between February 2017 and December 2018, who had made a decision to have joint replacement surgery within the previous year and were able to reflect on their outcomes.

RESULTS

On analysis a significantly greater proportion of TKA patients reported moderate or severe (Mod/Sev) DR [17.1% (56/328)] compared to THA patients [4.8% (18/376)]. Conversely, a significantly reduced proportion of TKA patients reported having No DR [42.1% (138/328)] compared to THA patients [66.7% (251/376)]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis joint replacement type (TKA/THA) and change in Oxford score were significant predictors of DR with gender, age, BMI and ASA grade not significantly associated. TKA patients were more than twice as likely to have Mod/Sev DR compared THA patients (Odds Ratio = 2.33 (95% CI 1.24-4.39)). Patients with poorer improvements in pain and function 1-year post-operatively (measured by Oxford scores) reported greater levels of DR.

CONCLUSION

TKA patients were significantly more likely to report greater levels of DR 1-year following surgery compared to THA patients. For both TKA and THA patients, greater levels of DR were associated with poorer Oxford scores. The use of decision aids to reduce post-operative DR in joint replacement patients should be examined especially for knee replacement patients.

摘要

背景

决策后悔(DR)是一种公认的治疗干预后以患者为中心的结局指标。本研究旨在测量初次全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术(THA/TKA)后的决策后悔情况,评估这些患者之间的差异,并探索可能的促成因素。

方法

在2017年2月至2018年12月期间,使用决策后悔量表对一组THA和TKA患者进行测量,这些患者在前一年决定进行关节置换手术,并且能够反思其手术结果。

结果

分析显示,与THA患者[4.8%(18/376)]相比,TKA患者中报告中度或重度(Mod/Sev)决策后悔的比例显著更高[17.1%(56/328)]。相反,与THA患者[66.7%(251/376)]相比,TKA患者中报告无决策后悔的比例显著降低[42.1%(138/328)]。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,关节置换类型(TKA/THA)和牛津评分的变化是决策后悔的显著预测因素,而性别、年龄、BMI和ASA分级与之无显著关联。与THA患者相比,TKA患者出现中度或重度决策后悔的可能性高出两倍多(比值比=2.33(95%可信区间1.24-4.39))。术后1年疼痛和功能改善较差(通过牛津评分测量)的患者报告的决策后悔程度更高。

结论

与THA患者相比,TKA患者在术后1年报告更高水平决策后悔的可能性显著更高。对于TKA和THA患者,更高水平的决策后悔都与较差的牛津评分相关。应研究使用决策辅助工具来减少关节置换患者术后的决策后悔,尤其是膝关节置换患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验