Shetty Sandeep, Evans Katie, Cornuaud Peter, Kulkarni Anay, Duffy Donovan, Greenough Anne
Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Neonatal Medicine, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
AJP Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(4):e127-e131. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739458. eCollection 2021 Oct.
During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA)/noninvasive (NIV) NAVA, a modified nasogastric feeding tube with electrodes monitors the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi). The Edi waveform determines the delivered pressure from the ventilator. Our objective was to determine whether NAVA/NIV-NAVA has advantages in infants with evolving/established bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Each infant who received NAVA/NIV-NAVA and conventional invasive and NIV was matched with two historical controls. Eighteen NAVA/NIV-NAVA infants' median gestational age, 25.3 (23.6-28.1) weeks, was compared with 36 historical controls' median gestational age 25.2 (23.1-29.1) weeks. Infants on NAVA/NIV-NAVA had lower extubation failure rates (median: 0 [0-2] vs. 1 [0-6] = 0.002), shorter durations of invasive ventilation (median: 30.5, [1-90] vs. 40.5 [11-199] days, = 0.046), and total duration of invasive and NIV to the point of discharge to the local hospital (median: 80 [57-140] vs. 103.5 [60-246] days, = 0.026). The overall length of stay (LOS) was lower in NAVA/NIVNAVA group (111.5 [78-183] vs. 140 [82-266] days, = 0.019). There were no significant differences in BPD (17/18 [94%] vs. 32/36 [89%] = 0.511) or home oxygen rates (14/18 [78%] vs. 23/36 [64%] = 0.305). The combination of NAVA/NIV-NAVA compared with conventional invasive and NIV modes may be advantageous for preterm infants with evolving/established BPD.
在神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)/无创(NIV)NAVA期间,带有电极的改良鼻胃饲管监测膈肌电活动(Edi)。Edi波形决定呼吸机输送的压力。
我们的目的是确定NAVA/NIV-NAVA在患有进展期/已确诊支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的婴儿中是否具有优势。
每例接受NAVA/NIV-NAVA以及传统有创通气和NIV的婴儿均与两名历史对照进行匹配。18例接受NAVA/NIV-NAVA的婴儿的中位胎龄为25.3(23.6 - 28.1)周,与36例历史对照的中位胎龄25.2(23.1 - 29.1)周进行比较。
接受NAVA/NIV-NAVA的婴儿拔管失败率较低(中位数:0 [0 - 2] 对1 [0 - 6],P = 0.002),有创通气持续时间较短(中位数:30.5,[1 - 90] 对40.5 [11 - 199]天,P = 0.046),以及到转至当地医院出院时的有创通气和NIV总持续时间较短(中位数:80 [57 - 140] 对103.5 [60 - 246]天,P = 0.026)。NAVA/NIV-NAVA组的总住院时间(LOS)较低(111.5 [78 - 183] 对140 [82 - 266]天,P = 0.019)。BPD发生率(17/18 [94%] 对32/36 [89%],P = 0.511)或家庭氧疗使用率(14/18 [78%] 对23/36 [64%],P = 0.305)无显著差异。
与传统有创通气和NIV模式相比,NAVA/NIV-NAVA联合使用可能对患有进展期/已确诊BPD的早产儿有益。