Suppr超能文献

应用标准化佳膳全营养配方餐刺激胆囊闪烁显像评估疑似功能性胆囊疾病患者的临床应用价值:一项七年临床经验回顾性研究。

Clinical utility of stimulated cholescintigraphy using a standardized Ensure-Plus fatty meal protocol in patients with suspected functional gallbladder disorder: a retrospective study of seven-years clinical experience.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Radiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Apr;92(4):774-780. doi: 10.1111/ans.17388. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of fatty meal stimulated cholescintigraphy particularly using a standardized formulation in patients with suspected functional gallbladder disorder has not been extensively studied. We present our seven-year clinical experience using an Ensure plus protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing stimulated cholescintigraphy using Ensure Plus for evaluation of suspected functional gallbladder disorder. A gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) of <33% was considered abnormal.

RESULTS

Of the 173 patients evaluated, 57 (33%) had an abnormal GBEF, 112 (65%) had a normal GBEF and 4 (2%) had no gallbladder visualization. Of the 57 patients with an abnormal GBEF, symptom improvement occurred in 30/31 (97%) who underwent cholecystectomy and in 17/26 (65%) who were managed conservatively (p = 0.003). Of the 112 patients with a normal GBEF, symptom improvement occurred in 8/10 (80%) who underwent cholecystectomy and 74/102 (73%) who were managed conservatively (p = 1.000). In the subgroup of 102 patients with a normal GBEF managed conservatively, those without symptomatic improvement had lower GBEFs compared to those with symptomatic improvement (median GBEF 46% versus 57%, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective results support a clinical role for stimulated cholescintigraphy using Ensure Plus in the evaluation of patients with suspected functional gallbladder disorder. While an abnormal GBEF predicts good surgical outcome, our results suggest that using an absolute GBEF cut off value of <33% may not apply to all patients and hence GBEF results should only be used as an adjunct in the surgical decision-making process.

摘要

背景

在疑似功能性胆囊疾病患者中,使用标准化配方的脂肪餐刺激胆闪烁显像术的临床实用性尚未得到广泛研究。我们介绍了我们使用 Ensure plus 方案的七年临床经验。

方法

对 173 例使用 Ensure Plus 进行刺激胆闪烁显像术评估疑似功能性胆囊疾病的患者进行回顾性研究。胆囊排空分数(GBEF)<33%被认为异常。

结果

在 173 例接受评估的患者中,57 例(33%)GBEF 异常,112 例(65%)GBEF 正常,4 例(2%)胆囊不显影。在 57 例 GBEF 异常的患者中,31 例(97%)接受胆囊切除术和 26 例(65%)接受保守治疗的患者症状改善(p=0.003)。在 112 例 GBEF 正常的患者中,10 例(80%)接受胆囊切除术和 102 例(73%)接受保守治疗的患者症状改善(p=1.000)。在 102 例接受保守治疗的 GBEF 正常的亚组中,症状无改善的患者的 GBEF 低于症状改善的患者(中位 GBEF 46%与 57%,p=0.019)。

结论

我们的回顾性结果支持使用 Ensure Plus 进行刺激胆闪烁显像术评估疑似功能性胆囊疾病患者的临床作用。虽然异常的 GBEF 预测良好的手术效果,但我们的结果表明,使用<33%的绝对 GBEF 截断值可能不适用于所有患者,因此 GBEF 结果仅应作为手术决策过程的辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验