Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Department of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Bishopstown Campus, Co. Cork, Ireland.
J Anim Sci. 2021 Dec 1;99(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab285.
In growing cattle, the phenotypic and genetic relationships between feeding behavior and both live animal ultrasound measures and subsequent carcass merit are generally poorly characterized. The objective of the current study was to quantify the phenotypic and genetic associations between a plethora of feeding behavior traits with both pre-slaughter ultrasound traits and post-slaughter carcass credentials in crossbred Bos taurus cattle. Carcass data were available on 3,146 young bulls, steers, and heifers, of which 2,795 and 2,445 also had records for pre-slaughter ultrasound muscle depth and intramuscular fat percentage, respectively; a total of 1,548 steers and heifers had information on all of the feeding behavior, ultrasound, and carcass traits. Young bulls were fed concentrates, while steers and heifers were fed a total mixed ration. Feeding behavior traits were defined based on individual feed events or meal events (i.e., individual feed events grouped into meals). Animal linear mixed models were used to estimate (co)variance components. Phenotypic correlations between feeding behavior and both ultrasound and carcass traits were generally weak and not different from zero, although there were phenotypic correlations of 0.40, 0.26, and 0.37 between carcass weight and feeding rate, energy intake per feed event, and energy intake per meal, respectively. Genetically, cattle that had heavier carcass weights, better carcass conformation, or a higher dressing percentage fed for a shorter time per day (genetic correlations [±SE] of -0.46 ± 0.12, -0.39 ± 0.11, and -0.50 ± 0.10, respectively). Genetic correlations of 0.43 ± 0.12 and 0.68 ± 0.13 were estimated between dressing difference (i.e., differential between live weight pre-slaughter and carcass weight) and energy intake per feed event and energy intake per meal, respectively. Neither intramuscular fat percentage measured on live animals nor carcass fat score (i.e., a measure of subcutaneous fat cover of the carcass) was genetically associated with any of the feeding behavior traits. The genetic associations between some feeding behavior traits and both ultrasound and carcass traits herein suggested that indirect responses in the feeding behavior of growing cattle from selection for improved carcass merit would be expected. Such changes in feeding behavior patterns in cattle may be reduced by measuring and including feeding behavior in a multiple-trait selection index alongside carcass traits.
在生长牛中,采食行为与活体超声测量和随后的胴体肉质之间的表型和遗传关系通常描述得很差。本研究的目的是量化杂交瘤牛采食行为的大量特征与屠宰前超声特征和屠宰后胴体特征之间的表型和遗传关联。3146 头公牛、阉牛和小母牛的胴体数据可用,其中 2795 头和 2445 头也分别有屠宰前超声肌肉深度和肌肉内脂肪百分比的记录;共有 1548 头阉牛和小母牛有所有采食行为、超声和胴体特征的信息。公牛喂精料,而阉牛和小母牛喂全混合日粮。采食行为特征是根据个体采食事件或采食餐事件(即,个体采食事件分为餐)来定义的。使用动物线性混合模型估计(协)方差分量。采食行为与超声和胴体特征之间的表型相关性通常较弱,与零值没有差异,但胴体重量与采食率、每次采食的能量摄入和每次采食的能量摄入之间的表型相关性分别为 0.40、0.26 和 0.37。在遗传上,牛的胴体重量越大、胴体形态越好或屠宰率越高,每天的采食时间越短(遗传相关系数[±标准误]分别为-0.46 ± 0.12、-0.39 ± 0.11 和-0.50 ± 0.10)。估计了活体重与胴体重之间的差异(即屠宰前活重与胴体重之间的差异)与每次采食的能量摄入和每次采食的能量摄入之间的遗传相关系数分别为 0.43 ± 0.12 和 0.68 ± 0.13。活体动物测量的肌肉内脂肪百分比和胴体脂肪评分(即胴体皮下脂肪覆盖的衡量标准)均与任何采食行为特征均无遗传关联。本文中,一些采食行为特征与超声和胴体特征之间的遗传关联表明,从改善胴体肉质的选择中,生长牛的采食行为的间接反应是可以预期的。通过在胴体特征的基础上,在多性状选择指数中测量和包括采食行为,可以减少牛采食行为模式的这种变化。