• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单部位与多部位血培养采样的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。

Single-Site Sampling versus Multisite Sampling for Blood Cultures: a Retrospective Clinical Study.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutegrid.4714.6t, Stockholm, Sweden.

Functional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Feb 16;60(2):e0193521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01935-21. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01935-21
PMID:34851687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8849186/
Abstract

The performance of blood cultures (BCs) relies on optimal sampling. Sepsis guidelines do not specify which sampling protocol to use but recommend two sets of BC bottles, each set containing one aerobic and one anaerobic bottle. For the single-site sampling (SSS) protocol, only one venipuncture is performed for all four bottles. The predominating multisite sampling (MSS) protocol implies that BC bottles are collected from two separate venipuncture sites. The aim of this study was to compare SSS and MSS. Primary outcomes were number of BC sets collected, sample volume, and diagnostic performance. This was a retrospective clinical study comparing BC results in an emergency department before and after changing the sampling protocol to SSS from MSS. All BC samples were incubated in the BacT/Alert BC system. The analysis included 5,248 patients before and 5,364 patients after the implementation of SSS. There was a significantly higher proportion of positive BCs sampled with SSS compared with MSS, 1,049/5,364 (19.56%) and 932/5,248 (17.76%), respectively (0.018). This difference was due to a higher proportion of solitary BC sets (two BC bottles) in MSS. Analyzing only patients with the recommended four BC bottles, there was no difference in positivity. SSS had a higher proportion of BC bottles with the recommended sample volumes of 8-12 ml than MSS (0.001). Changing the sampling protocol to SSS from MSS resulted in higher positivity rates, higher sample volume and fewer solitary BC sets. These advantages of SSS should be considered in future sepsis guidelines.

摘要

血培养(BC)的性能依赖于最佳的采样。脓毒症指南并未指定使用哪种采样方案,但建议使用两套 BC 瓶,每套瓶中各包含一个需氧瓶和一个厌氧瓶。对于单点采样(SSS)方案,仅对所有四套瓶进行一次静脉穿刺。主要的多点采样(MSS)方案意味着从两个不同的静脉穿刺部位采集 BC 瓶。本研究旨在比较 SSS 和 MSS。主要结局是采集的 BC 套数、样本量和诊断性能。这是一项回顾性临床研究,比较了改变采样方案为 SSS 前后急诊部的 BC 结果。所有 BC 样本均在 BacT/Alert BC 系统中孵育。分析包括 SSS 实施前的 5248 例患者和 SSS 实施后的 5364 例患者。与 MSS 相比,SSS 采集的阳性 BC 比例明显更高,分别为 1049/5364(19.56%)和 932/5248(17.76%)(0.018)。这种差异是由于 MSS 中单瓶 BC 套(两套 BC 瓶)的比例较高。仅分析推荐的四套 BC 瓶的患者,阳性率没有差异。SSS 中推荐的 8-12ml 样本量的 BC 瓶比例高于 MSS(0.001)。将采样方案从 MSS 改为 SSS 可提高阳性率、增加样本量和减少单瓶 BC 套。在未来的脓毒症指南中应考虑 SSS 的这些优势。

相似文献

1
Single-Site Sampling versus Multisite Sampling for Blood Cultures: a Retrospective Clinical Study.单部位与多部位血培养采样的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Feb 16;60(2):e0193521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01935-21. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study.脓毒症血培养的单样本采集策略与多样本采集策略:一项前瞻性非劣效性研究
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;11:1639. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01639. eCollection 2020.
3
Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Sample Volume in Blood Culture Bottles.血培养瓶样本量特征的详细分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jul 26;57(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-19. Print 2019 Aug.
4
Quality indicators for blood culture: 1 year of monitoring with BacT/Alert Virtuo at a French hospital.血液培养的质量指标:法国某医院使用 BacT/Alert Virtuo 监测 1 年的结果。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Mar;70(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001300. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
High medical impact of implementing the new polymeric bead-based BacT/ALERT® FAPlus and FNPlus blood culture bottles in standard care.在标准护理中实施新型基于聚合物微珠的BacT/ALERT® FAPlus和FNPlus血培养瓶具有很高的医学影响力。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):1031-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2319-8. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
6
Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures-Analysis at a tertiary medical center.影响血培养分析前质量的因素——一家三级医疗中心的分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282918. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of a model to improve collection of blood cultures in patients with sepsis in the emergency room.评估一种模型,以改善急诊科脓毒症患者血培养的采集。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;37(2):241-246. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3122-5. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
8
Deficits in blood culture collection in the emergency department if sepsis is suspected: results of a retrospective cohort study.怀疑脓毒症时急诊科血培养采集的缺陷:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。
Infection. 2024 Aug;52(4):1385-1396. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02197-x. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
9
An emergency department intervention to improve earlier detection of community-onset bloodstream infection among hospitalized patients.一项改善住院患者中社区获得性血流感染早期检测的急诊科干预措施。
Am J Infect Control. 2024 Jun;52(6):664-669. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
10
Performance of two blood culture systems to detect anaerobic bacteria. Is there any difference?两种血培养系统检测厌氧菌的性能。有差异吗?
Anaerobe. 2017 Jun;45:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of relevant pathogens and contaminants in blood cultures after implementation of single-sampling strategy and initial specimen diversion.实施单样本采集策略和初始样本分流后血培养中相关病原体和污染物的检测
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05196-4.
2
Bloodstream infections in a rural hospital in Sierra Leone: a retrospective database study.塞拉利昂一家乡村医院的血流感染:一项回顾性数据库研究
J Med Microbiol. 2025 May;74(5). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.002014.
3
Performance of T2Bacteria in relationship to blood cultures - a retrospective comparative study.T2细菌与血培养相关性的表现——一项回顾性比较研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Oct;43(10):1977-1987. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04916-6. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
4
Improving Blood Culture Quality with a Medical Staff Educational Program: A Prospective Cohort Study.通过医务人员教育计划提高血培养质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jun 7;16:3607-3617. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S412348. eCollection 2023.
5
Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.大数据在胃肠病学研究中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 27;24(3):2458. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032458.

本文引用的文献

1
The epidemiology of bloodstream infections and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Thuringia, Germany: a five-year prospective, state-wide surveillance study (AlertsNet).德国图林根州血流感染的流行病学和抗菌药物敏感性模式:一项为期五年的前瞻性、全州范围的监测研究(AlertsNet)。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Sep 8;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00997-6.
2
Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study.脓毒症血培养的单样本采集策略与多样本采集策略:一项前瞻性非劣效性研究
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;11:1639. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01639. eCollection 2020.
3
Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Sample Volume in Blood Culture Bottles.血培养瓶样本量特征的详细分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jul 26;57(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-19. Print 2019 Aug.
4
Estimation of missed bloodstream infections without the third blood culture set: a retrospective observational single-centre study.未采集第三套血培养标本的血流感染漏检评估:一项回顾性观察性单中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Apr;25(4):469-473. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Contaminants in blood cultures: importance, implications, interpretation and prevention.血培养中的污染物:重要性、影响、解读和预防。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):964-969. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
Towards precision medicine in sepsis: a position paper from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.迈向脓毒症精准医学:欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会立场文件。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1264-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
7
How to: accreditation of blood cultures' proceedings. A clinical microbiology approach for adding value to patient care.方法:血培养程序的认证。为患者护理增值的临床微生物学方法。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):956-963. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Paired blood cultures increase the sensitivity for detecting pathogens in both inpatients and outpatients.配对血培养可提高住院患者和门诊患者的病原体检测灵敏度。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;37(3):435-441. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3188-8. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
10
Best Clinical Practice: Blood Culture Utility in the Emergency Department.最佳临床实践:急诊科血培养的应用
J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.