Earth and Life Institute: Environmental Sciences, UCLouvain, 1, Croix du Sud, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Earth and Life Institute: Earth and Climate, UCLouvain, 3, Place Louis Pasteur, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Earth and Life Institute: Environmental Sciences, UCLouvain, 1, Croix du Sud, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 2):150422. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150422. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
This study aimed to simulate oak and beech forest growth under various scenarios of climate change and to evaluate how the forest response depends on site properties and particularly on stand characteristics using the individual process-based model HETEROFOR. First, this model was evaluated on a wide range of site conditions. We used data from 36 long-term forest monitoring plots to initialize, calibrate, and evaluate HETEROFOR. This evaluation showed that HETEROFOR predicts individual tree radial growth and height increment reasonably well under different growing conditions when evaluated on independent sites. In our simulations under constant CO concentration ([CO]) for the 2071-2100 period, climate change induced a moderate net primary production (NPP) gain in continental and mountainous zones and no change in the oceanic zone. The NPP changes were negatively affected by air temperature during the vegetation period and by the annual rainfall decrease. To a lower extent, they were influenced by soil extractable water reserve and stand characteristics. These NPP changes were positively affected by longer vegetation periods and negatively by drought for beech and larger autotrophic respiration costs for oak. For both species, the NPP gain was much larger with rising CO concentration ([CO]) mainly due to the CO fertilisation effect. Even if the species composition and structure had a limited influence on the forest response to climate change, they explained a large part of the NPP variability (44% and 34% for [CO] and [CO], respectively) compared to the climate change scenario (5% and 29%) and the inter-annual climate variability (20% and 16%). This gives the forester the possibility to act on the productivity of broadleaved forests and prepare them for possible adverse effects of climate change by reinforcing their resilience.
本研究旨在模拟不同气候变化情景下的橡树和山毛榉林生长,并使用基于个体的过程模型 HETEROFOR 评估森林对气候变化的响应如何取决于地点特性,特别是林分特征。首先,该模型在广泛的地点条件下进行了评估。我们使用来自 36 个长期森林监测站的数据来初始化、校准和评估 HETEROFOR。评估表明,当在独立站点上评估时,HETEROFOR 在不同的生长条件下可以合理地预测单株树木的径向生长和高度增量。在我们对 2071-2100 年期间 CO 浓度([CO])恒定的模拟中,气候变化导致大陆和山区的净初级生产力(NPP)适度增加,而海洋区没有变化。NPP 变化受到植被期空气温度和年降雨量减少的负面影响。在较低程度上,它们受到土壤可提取水储量和林分特征的影响。这些 NPP 变化受到植被期延长和山毛榉干旱的积极影响,以及栎属树木自动呼吸成本的增加的负面影响。对于这两个物种,由于 CO 施肥效应,[CO]的升高主要导致 NPP 增加。即使物种组成和结构对森林对气候变化的响应有一定的影响,但与气候变化情景(5%和 29%)和年际气候变异性(20%和 16%)相比,它们解释了 NPP 变异性的很大一部分([CO]和[CO]分别为 44%和 34%)。这使得林务员有可能通过增强其弹性来提高阔叶林的生产力,并为可能的气候变化不利影响做好准备。