Suppr超能文献

新型无针系统与牙科针在儿童中的疼痛感知比较评估:一项随机临床试验。

Comparative evaluation of pain perception with a new needle-free system and dental needle method in children: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60250, Tokat, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01524-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain control during dental procedures is one of the most important topics related to behavior management in children. This study aims to compare the pain perception associated with a needle-free system (Comfort-In™) and the dental needle method during filling and pulpotomy treatments in children.

METHODS

The study included teeth that required treatment (pulpotomy or filling treatment) in 56 patients aged 4 to 11 years with no systemic problems or history of allergy. Patients were randomly divided into the needle-free system group (filling treatment, n = 13; pulpotomy, n = 15) and dental needle method group (filling treatment, n = 14; pulpotomy, n = 14). For pulpotomy and filling treatment performed with 0.3 mL anesthesia, the active ingredient of which is 2% lidocaine and 1/80000 epinephrine. The patients' behavior before the procedure was evaluated by a pediatric dentist using the Frankl Behavior Scale. The pain intensity was assessed Immediately after injection (induction), during treatment (treatment), and at the end of the treatment (post treatment) by the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale.

RESULTS

The median (IQR-InterQuartile Range) induction pain value was 6[3-8] and 2[0-4] in dental needle method and needle-free system respectively, p < 0.001). In filling and pulpotomy treatment group, no difference between the needle and needle-free group for treatment and post-treatment pain values.

CONCLUSIONS

For pulpotomy and filling treatment, needle-free system performed with 0.3 mL anesthesia was found as effective as infiltrative anesthesia with a dental needle method.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04653974 . Registered 4 December 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

在牙科操作过程中控制疼痛是与儿童行为管理相关的最重要的课题之一。本研究旨在比较无针系统(Comfort-In™)和牙科针在儿童补牙和牙髓切断术中的疼痛感知。

方法

该研究纳入了 56 名年龄在 4 至 11 岁之间、无全身问题或过敏史的需要治疗(牙髓切断或补牙治疗)的牙齿。患者随机分为无针系统组(补牙治疗,n=13;牙髓切断术,n=15)和牙科针组(补牙治疗,n=14;牙髓切断术,n=14)。对于 0.3ml 麻醉剂(活性成分 2%利多卡因和 1/80000 肾上腺素)进行的牙髓切断术和补牙治疗,在治疗前由儿童牙医使用 Frankl 行为量表对患者的行为进行评估。使用 Wong-Baker 面部疼痛量表在注射后即刻(诱导期)、治疗期间(治疗中)和治疗结束时(治疗后)评估疼痛强度。

结果

牙科针和无针系统的诱导疼痛中位数(IQR-四分位数范围)分别为 6[3-8]和 2[0-4],p<0.001)。在补牙和牙髓切断术组中,无针组和有针组在治疗和治疗后疼痛值方面无差异。

结论

对于牙髓切断术和补牙治疗,使用 0.3ml 麻醉的无针系统与牙科针浸润麻醉一样有效。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04653974。2020 年 12 月 4 日注册-回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/8638438/ad0bdc896a98/12871_2021_1524_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验