Vahtera Varpu, Edgecombe Gregory D, Giribet Gonzalo
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Cladistics. 2012 Feb;28(1):4-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00361.x. Epub 2011 May 24.
Relative to its diversity (34 genera, 700 species), Scolopendromorpha has been undersampled in molecular phylogenetic analyses compared with the other chilopod orders. Previous analyses based on morphology have not resolved several key controversies in systematics and evolutionary morphology unambiguously. Here we apply new molecular and morphological data to scolopendromorph phylogenetics, with a focus on the evolution of blindness. The taxonomic sample includes 19 genera, many lacking previous molecular data, and diverse, cosmopolitan genera of Scolopendridae are sampled by multiple species. Phylogenetic analysis with Direct Optimization used 94 morphological characters and ca. 4.5 kb of sequence data from two nuclear (18S and 28S rRNA) and two mitochondrial (16S rRNA and COI) loci. A single most-parsimonious cladogram selected after sensitivity analyses resolves Scolopendromorpha as monophyletic, and divides it into a blind clade of three families (Plutoniumidae, Cryptopidae, Scolopocryptopidae) and its ocellate sister group, Scolopendridae. Some species-rich, cosmopolitan genera (Cormocephalus, Otostigmus, Scolopendra) in Scolopendridae are non-monophyletic, and in several instances (e.g. New and Old World Scolopendra) relationships are more congruent with geographical distributions than with traditional classifications. The tribe Asanadini is particularly subject to parameter-sensitivity, nesting in the combined analysis within Scolopendrini but as sister to all other Scolopendrinae for molecular data alone. The total-evidence tree unambiguously optimizes trunk segmentation: a 23-segmented trunk has a single origin in the blind clade. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.
相对于其多样性(34个属,700种)而言,与其他唇足纲目相比,地蜈蚣目在分子系统发育分析中的取样不足。以往基于形态学的分析未能明确解决系统学和进化形态学中的几个关键争议。在此,我们将新的分子和形态学数据应用于地蜈蚣目的系统发育研究,重点关注失明的进化。分类样本包括19个属,其中许多属缺乏先前的分子数据,并且通过多个物种对蜈蚣科中分布广泛且多样的属进行了取样。使用直接优化法进行的系统发育分析采用了94个形态学特征以及来自两个核基因座(18S和28S rRNA)和两个线粒体基因座(16S rRNA和COI)的约4.5 kb序列数据。在敏感性分析后选择的一个最简约分支图将地蜈蚣目解析为单系群,并将其分为一个包含三个科(冥蜈蚣科、隐蜈蚣科、穴蜈蚣科)的无眼类群及其有眼的姐妹类群蜈蚣科。蜈蚣科中一些物种丰富、分布广泛的属(如头蜈蚣属、耳孔蜈蚣属、蜈蚣属)并非单系群,并且在一些情况下(如新旧世界的蜈蚣属),其亲缘关系与地理分布的一致性高于传统分类。阿萨纳迪尼族尤其受参数敏感性的影响,在联合分析中嵌套于蜈蚣族内,但仅就分子数据而言,它是所有其他蜈蚣亚科的姐妹群。全证据树明确地优化了躯干节段划分:一个由二十三个节段组成的躯干在无眼类群中有单一的起源。©威利·亨尼希学会2011年。