Chandra Vemulapalli K, Pechero Guillermo R, Warner Stephen J, Achor Timothy S, Gary Joshua L, Munz John W, Choo Andrew M, Prasarn Mark L, Chip Routt Milton L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX USA.
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):640-644. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.037. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Nonunion rates for distal femur fractures treated with lateral locked plating (LLP) remains as high as 18-22% despite significant advances with implant design and construct modulation. However, whether treatment of distal femur fractures with rIMN has improved outcomes compared to LLP has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of complete articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33-C) treated with either LLP or rIMN.
106 distal femur fractures in 106 patients between January 2014 and January 2018 were identified. Medical records were reviewed to collect patient age, gender, body mass index, sagittal and coronal plane alignment on immediate postoperative radiographs, time to union, incidence of nonunion, and incidence of secondary operative procedures for repair of a nonunion.
Of 106 patients, 50 underwent rIMN and 56 underwent LLP. The mean age at the time of injury was 51 years (21 to 86 years) and there were 55 males. Average coronal alignment of 83.7° of anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) and sagittal alignment of <1° of apex anterior angulation in the rIMN group. In the LLP group there was an average of 87.9° of aLDFA and 1.9° of apex anterior angulation (p = .005 and p = .36). Average time to union in the rIMN group was 6 months and 6.6 months in the LLP group (p = .52). Incidence of nonunion in the rIMN group was 11.8% and 27.5% in the LLP group (p = .008). There were 8 secondary procedures for nonunion in the rIMN group and 18 in the LLP group (p = .43).
Our results demonstrated a higher nonunion rate and coronal plane malalignment with LLP compared to rIMN. While prospective data is required, rIMN does appear to be an appropriate treatment for complete articular distal femur fractures with a potentially decreased rate of nonunion .
尽管在植入物设计和结构调整方面取得了显著进展,但采用外侧锁定钢板(LLP)治疗的股骨远端骨折不愈合率仍高达18%-22%。然而,与LLP相比,逆行髓内钉(rIMN)治疗股骨远端骨折是否能改善预后尚未得到充分阐明。本研究的目的是比较采用LLP或rIMN治疗的完全关节内股骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 33-C)的预后。
确定2014年1月至2018年1月期间106例患者的106例股骨远端骨折。回顾病历以收集患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、术后即刻X线片上的矢状面和冠状面排列、愈合时间、不愈合发生率以及不愈合修复的二次手术发生率。
106例患者中,50例行rIMN治疗,56例行LLP治疗。受伤时的平均年龄为51岁(21至86岁),男性55例。rIMN组解剖学外侧远端股骨角(aLDFA)的平均冠状面对齐角度为83.7°,顶点前角度的矢状面对齐角度<1°。LLP组aLDFA平均为87.9°,顶点前角度为1.9°(p = 0.005和p = 0.36)。rIMN组的平均愈合时间为6个月,LLP组为6.6个月(p = 0.52)。rIMN组的不愈合发生率为11.8%,LLP组为27.5%(p = 0.008)。rIMN组有8例不愈合的二次手术,LLP组有18例(p = 0.43)。
我们的结果表明,与rIMN相比,LLP的不愈合率更高,冠状面畸形更严重。虽然需要前瞻性数据,但rIMN似乎是治疗完全关节内股骨远端骨折的一种合适方法,其不愈合率可能会降低。