• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AmpuTee 活动度分析(MAAT7):不同年龄、病因和截肢水平下肢假肢使用者的正常活动度值。

Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative Mobility Values for Lower Limb Prosthesis Users of Varying Age, Etiology, and Amputation Level.

机构信息

From the Department of Clinical and Scientific Affairs, Hanger Clinic, Austin, Texas (DLE, TAM, PMS, JHC, SRW); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina (TAM); School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (PMS); and Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska (SRW).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 1;101(9):850-858. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001925. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001925
PMID:34864771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377488/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to establish normative values of lower limb amputation mobility across primary etiologies based on age and amputation level.

DESIGN

This study is a cross-sectional observational analysis of outcomes. A total of 11,995 lower limb prosthesis users were included in the analysis. Participants were grouped by etiology into four categories: cancer, congenital, trauma, and diabetes/dysvascular. Mobility was assessed by using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility.

RESULTS

Mobility across seven age groups for the four etiologies was established for both above-the-knee amputation and below-the-knee amputation. Differences were found between age groups for individuals: above-the-knee amputation: cancer (χ 2 (6) = 40.97, P < 0.001), congenital (χ 2 (3) = 9.41, P = 0.024), trauma (χ 2 (6) = 18.89, P = 0.004), and dysvascular (χ 2 (5) = 39.73, P < 0.001; below-the-knee amputation: cancer (χ 2 (6) = 29.77, P < 0.001), trauma (χ 2 (6) = 28.22, P < 0.001), and dysvascular (χ 2 (6) = 144.66, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The awareness of differences across amputation etiologies extending across the lifespan of ages can assist the goal-setting process as part of prosthetic rehabilitation. In addition, refined normative values provide the ability to benchmark new and innovative changes in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据年龄和截肢部位,为主要病因导致的下肢截肢者制定移动能力的正常值。

设计

这是一项关于结局的横断面观察性分析研究。共纳入 11995 名下肢假体使用者进行分析。参与者按病因分为四类:癌症、先天性、创伤和糖尿病/血管病变。使用假体使用者移动能力调查问卷评估移动能力。

结果

为四种病因的所有 7 个年龄组的膝上截肢和膝下截肢建立了移动能力正常值。在年龄组之间,发现了个体之间的差异:膝上截肢:癌症(χ 2 (6) = 40.97,P < 0.001)、先天性(χ 2 (3) = 9.41,P = 0.024)、创伤(χ 2 (6) = 18.89,P = 0.004)和血管病变(χ 2 (5) = 39.73,P < 0.001);膝下截肢:癌症(χ 2 (6) = 29.77,P < 0.001)、创伤(χ 2 (6) = 28.22,P < 0.001)和血管病变(χ 2 (6) = 144.66,P < 0.001)。

结论

认识到各种病因导致的截肢者在整个生命周期内的差异,可以帮助设定假肢康复的目标。此外,细化的正常值为基准评估临床实践中的新的创新变化提供了能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9377488/11820394915b/ajpmr-101-0850-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9377488/e490f9ef3e67/ajpmr-101-0850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9377488/11820394915b/ajpmr-101-0850-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9377488/e490f9ef3e67/ajpmr-101-0850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9377488/11820394915b/ajpmr-101-0850-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative Mobility Values for Lower Limb Prosthesis Users of Varying Age, Etiology, and Amputation Level.AmpuTee 活动度分析(MAAT7):不同年龄、病因和截肢水平下肢假肢使用者的正常活动度值。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 1;101(9):850-858. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001925. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Creating Adjusted Scores Targeting mobiLity Empowerment (CASTLE 1): determination of normative mobility scores after lower limb amputation for each year of adulthood.创建针对移动能力赋权的调整后得分(CASTLE1):确定下肢截肢后每个成年年度的规范移动得分。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1904-1910. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2208376. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).开发用于测量下肢截肢者假肢移动能力的项目库:假肢使用者移动性调查(PLUS-M)。
PM R. 2023 Apr;15(4):456-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
4
Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.下肢截肢成人假肢使用者运动能力调查(PLUS-M)的结构效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Mobility with a lower limb prosthesis: experiences of users with high levels of functional ability.下肢假体的活动能力:功能能力较高的使用者的体验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(13):3236-3244. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1851400. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
The impact a surgeon has on primary amputee prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey of residual lower limb quality.外科医生对初次截肢者假肢康复的影响:下肢残肢质量调查
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Aug;42(4):428-436. doi: 10.1177/0309364618757768. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
Disparities in functional recovery after dysvascular lower limb amputation are associated with employment status and self-efficacy.血管性下肢截肢后功能恢复的差异与就业状况和自我效能感有关。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jul;45(14):2280-2287. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2087762. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 4): classification tree analysis for probability of lower limb prosthesis user functional potential.截肢者移动性分析(MAAT 4):下肢假肢使用者功能潜力概率的分类树分析
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Feb;15(2):211-218. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1555290. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Mobility analysis of amputees (MAAT 3): Matching individuals based on comorbid health reveals improved function for above-knee prosthesis users with microprocessor knee technology.截肢者的活动能力分析(MAAT3):基于合并症健康状况对个体进行匹配,显示使用微处理器膝关节技术的大腿假肢使用者的功能得到改善。
Assist Technol. 2020 Sep 2;32(5):236-242. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1530701. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
A pilot study examining measures of balance and mobility in children with unilateral lower-limb amputation.一项关于单侧下肢截肢儿童平衡和活动能力测量的试点研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Feb;40(1):65-74. doi: 10.1177/0309364614560941. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Levels and determinants of ambulatory mobility in lower-limb prosthesis users from urban and rural Cambodia: a cross-sectional survey study.柬埔寨城乡下肢假肢使用者的动态活动能力水平及其决定因素:一项横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e101187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101187.
2
Predictors of quality of life in individuals with non-traumatic unilateral transtibial amputation.非创伤性单侧经胫骨截肢患者生活质量的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 14;20(7):e0327781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327781. eCollection 2025.
3
Detecting Changes in Comfort, Pain, and Mobility Over Clinical Milestones for Individuals With Lower Limb Loss.
检测下肢缺失个体在临床关键节点上舒适度、疼痛和活动能力的变化。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2024 Oct 25;7(1):43890. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43890. eCollection 2024.
4
Transfemoral Osseointegration for Amputees with Well-Managed Diabetes Mellitus.经股动脉骨整合术用于糖尿病控制良好的截肢患者。
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Dec 2;9(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00168. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
5
The relationship of hip strength to walking and balance performance in unilateral lower limb prosthesis users differs by amputation level.单侧下肢假肢使用者的髋部力量与步行和平衡能力之间的关系因截肢水平而异。
PM R. 2025 Feb;17(2):147-158. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13245. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
6
Development and initial validation of the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M): An item bank for evaluating mobility of people who use lower-limb orthoses.下肢矫形器使用者移动能力的矫形器患者报告结局-移动性(OPRO-M)的制定和初步验证:用于评估使用下肢矫形器的人的移动能力的项目库。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293848. eCollection 2023.
7
Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users.下肢假体使用者中使用二次假体的流行率。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Mar;46(5):1016-1022. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2182919. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
8
Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).开发用于测量下肢截肢者假肢移动能力的项目库:假肢使用者移动性调查(PLUS-M)。
PM R. 2023 Apr;15(4):456-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962. Epub 2023 Mar 31.