Department of Pediatrics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hematology. 2021 Dec;26(1):995-1006. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2021.2006409.
This meta-analysis examined the prognostic role of brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic (BAALC), Ecotropic virus integration site-1 (EVI1) and Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) genes at different time-points during conventional chemotherapy.
A systematic search of publications indexed in the electronic databases from January 1988 to October 2020 was performed. Over 7525 cases of AML from 25 studies were involved.
At diagnosis, overexpression of either BAALC or EVI1 had a negative impact on complete remission achievement (Summary Odds ratios [SORs] for BAALC = 0.32; SORs for EVI1 = 0.49) and survival outcome. The summary hazard ratios of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 1.97 and 2.04 for BAALC and 1.33 and 1.86 for EVI1, respectively. The prognostic value of pretreatment WT1 levels was heterogeneous while subgroup analyses unveiled that overexpressed WT1 may correlate with a favorable outcome (summary hazard ratio [SHR] for OS = 0.42). Both WT1 and BAALC played a role in prognosis assessment at post-induction and the diagnostic performance of WT1 transcript reduction was superior to the absolute WT1 level. Post-consolidation WT1 overexpression consistently indicated an increased risk of relapse, while the combined HR for RFS was statistically insignificant (SHR = 4.22).
These findings confirm the application of BAALC and EVI1 at diagnosis, WT1 after induction chemotherapy in AML patients throughout conventional chemotherapy.
本荟萃分析研究了脑和急性白血病、细胞质(BAALC)、嗜性病毒整合位点-1(EVI1)和维尔姆斯瘤-1(WT1)基因在常规化疗不同时间点的预后作用。
系统检索了 1988 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月电子数据库中索引的出版物,涉及 25 项研究的超过 7525 例 AML 患者。
在诊断时,BAALC 或 EVI1 的过表达对完全缓解的获得(BAALC 的汇总优势比[SOR]为 0.32;EVI1 的 SOR 为 0.49)和生存结果有负面影响。总体生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的汇总危险比(HR)分别为 1.97 和 2.04 用于 BAALC 和 1.33 和 1.86 用于 EVI1。预处理 WT1 水平的预后价值具有异质性,而亚组分析表明,WT1 过表达可能与良好的预后相关(OS 的汇总危险比[SHR]为 0.42)。WT1 和 BAALC 均在诱导后用于预后评估,WT1 转录本减少的诊断性能优于绝对 WT1 水平。巩固后 WT1 过表达始终表明复发风险增加,而 RFS 的合并 HR 无统计学意义(SHR=4.22)。
这些发现证实了 BAALC 和 EVI1 在 AML 患者诊断时、WT1 在诱导化疗后用于常规化疗中的应用。