Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of NorthCarolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (Dr Dude).
Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (Dr Schueler).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2):100549. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100549. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
In the United States, approximately 52,000 women per year (accounting for 1.46% of births) experience severe maternal morbidity, which is defined as a complication that causes significant maternal harm or risk of death. It disproportionately affects women from racial or ethnic minorities, people with chronic diseases, and those with Medicaid or no insurance. Preconception care has been hailed as a strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes and reduce disparities, but its broad benefits for maternal outcomes have not been demonstrated.
Our objective was to measure the association between preconception care and the odds of severe maternal morbidity among women with Medicaid.
This is a secondary analysis of Medicaid claims using the Medicaid Analytic Extract files (2010-2012). We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, published by the US Office of Population Affairs' Quality Family Planning program to define 7 domains of preconception care. The primary outcome was maternal death within 12 weeks of delivery or severe maternal morbidity during birth hospitalization, defined by the presence of any diagnosis or procedure on the severe maternal morbidity International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code list from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because this list may overestimate severe maternal morbidity by counting any blood transfusion, our secondary outcome used the same code list but without transfusion. We reviewed care in the year before conception and used logistic regression to estimate the association between each domain and severe maternal morbidity for all births to women enrolled in Medicaid and aged 15 to 45 years with births during 2012. We performed a subgroup analysis for women with chronic disease (kidney disease, hypertension, or diabetes).
Severe maternal morbidity or death occurred in 26,285 births (1.74%) when including blood transfusions and 9,481 births (0.63%) when excluding transfusions. Receiving contraceptive services in the year before conception was associated with decreased odds of severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.95) and pregnancy test services were associated with increased odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.14). In the primary analysis, no significant associations were observed for other preconception care domains. Among those women with at least 1 chronic disease, contraceptive care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.95) and routine physical or gynecologic exams (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.88) were associated with decreased odds of severe maternal morbidity. Similar associations were found for severe maternal morbidity when excluding blood transfusion.
Contraceptive services in the year before conception and routine exams for women with chronic disease are associated with decreased odds of severe maternal morbidity or death for Medicaid enrollees.
在美国,每年约有 52000 名女性(占出生人数的 1.46%)经历严重的产妇发病率,这被定义为导致严重产妇伤害或死亡风险的并发症。它不成比例地影响到来自种族或少数民族、患有慢性病的妇女,以及那些有医疗补助或没有保险的妇女。孕前保健被誉为改善妊娠结局和减少差异的策略,但它对产妇结局的广泛益处尚未得到证实。
我们的目的是衡量在有医疗补助的妇女中,孕前保健与严重产妇发病率之间的关联。
这是对使用医疗补助分析提取文件(2010-2012 年)的医疗补助索赔的二次分析。我们使用了美国人口事务办公室计划生育质量项目发布的国际疾病分类,第九修订版代码,来定义孕前保健的 7 个领域。主要结局是分娩后 12 周内产妇死亡或分娩期间严重产妇发病率,由疾病控制和预防中心的严重产妇发病率国际疾病分类,第九修订版代码列表中的任何诊断或程序定义。由于该列表可能通过计数任何输血来高估严重产妇发病率,我们的次要结局使用了相同的代码列表,但没有输血。我们回顾了受孕前一年的护理情况,并使用逻辑回归来估计每个领域与所有在 2012 年生育且年龄在 15 至 45 岁之间的参加医疗补助的妇女的严重产妇发病率之间的关联。我们对患有慢性病(肾病、高血压或糖尿病)的妇女进行了亚组分析。
在包括输血的情况下,26285 例分娩(1.74%)发生严重产妇发病率或死亡,在排除输血的情况下,9481 例分娩(0.63%)发生严重产妇发病率或死亡。在受孕前一年接受避孕服务与严重产妇发病率的几率降低相关(调整后的优势比,0.92;95%置信区间,0.88-0.95),而妊娠测试服务与几率增加相关(调整后的优势比,1.08;95%置信区间,1.01-1.14)。在主要分析中,没有观察到其他孕前保健领域的显著关联。在至少患有 1 种慢性病的妇女中,避孕护理(调整后的优势比,0.84;95%置信区间,0.75-0.95)和常规身体或妇科检查(调整后的优势比,0.79;95%置信区间,0.71-0.88)与严重产妇发病率的几率降低相关。在排除输血的情况下,也发现了与严重产妇发病率相关的类似关联。
对于参加医疗补助的人来说,在受孕前一年提供避孕服务和对患有慢性病的妇女进行常规检查与严重产妇发病率或死亡的几率降低相关。