Suppr超能文献

使用T-scan比较采用MBT矫治器和自结扎技术的未经治疗和正畸治疗的非拔牙病例的咬合力。

Comparing bite force in untreated and orthodontically treated non- extraction cases with MBT appliance and self ligation technique using T-scan.

作者信息

Gupta Sakshi, Singh Gurkeerat, Kannan Sridhar, Singh Raj Kumar, Goyal Varun, Gupta Nishant

机构信息

Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, India.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Jan-Feb;12(1):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Abstract

AIM

Aim of this cross sectional study was to compare the bite force and the individual tooth load among three groups of patients: cases finished with the Self ligation appliance (Damon-Q®, 0.022"X0.028" prescription) cases finished with the MBT (McLaughlin, Bennett and Trevisi) appliance system (0.022"X0.028"prescription) and orthodontically untreated cases using T-Scan® 9.0 version.

MATERIAL & METHODS: A sample size of sixty non-extraction cases were divided equally into three groups - Group 1: patients treated with Self-ligation appliance (Damon Q®), Group 2: cases treated with the MBT prescription and Group 3: untreated subjects with Class I canine and molar relationship who were used as the control group. The bite force and distribution of force was measured on the right and left side as well as individual tooth loads were measured using the T-Scan® 9.0 device and inter-and intra-group comparisons made using Paired -Test, ANOVA and Chi-square test.

RESULT

The bite forces were balanced on both the sides in cases treated with Self-ligation and MBT appliance. The Self-ligation finishes were marginally better than the MBT group but the difference was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Orthodontically treated individuals had a better (or more even) bite force distribution compared to untreated participants.

摘要

目的

本横断面研究的目的是比较三组患者的咬合力和单颗牙齿负荷:使用自锁矫治器(Damon-Q®,0.022"×0.028"规格)完成治疗的病例、使用MBT(麦克劳林、贝内特和特雷维西)矫治器系统(0.022"×0.028"规格)完成治疗的病例以及使用T-Scan® 9.0版本未接受正畸治疗的病例。

材料与方法

选取60例非拔牙病例作为样本,平均分为三组——第1组:接受自锁矫治器(Damon Q®)治疗的患者;第2组:接受MBT规格治疗的病例;第3组:作为对照组的I类犬牙和磨牙关系未治疗受试者。使用T-Scan® 9.0设备测量左右两侧的咬合力和力的分布以及单颗牙齿负荷,并使用配对检验、方差分析和卡方检验进行组间和组内比较。

结果

使用自锁矫治器和MBT矫治器治疗的病例两侧咬合力平衡。自锁矫治器组的结果略优于MBT组,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

与未接受治疗的参与者相比,接受正畸治疗的个体咬合力分布更好(或更均匀)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0098/8628211/a3c0b74250f9/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验