Ottenhoff Janna S E, Spaans Anne J, Braakenburg Assa, Teunis Teun, van Minnen L Paul, Mink van der Molen Aebele B
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.
J Wrist Surg. 2021 May 4;10(6):502-510. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728806. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Joint distraction is a fairly new treatment for patients with symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA). A previous pilot study of five patients showed that CMC1 joint distraction is technically feasible. The current study presents the results of CMC1 joint distraction in 20 patients with a 2-year follow-up period. The primary study aim was to assess if patients with CMC1 OA have better physical function and less pain 2 years after CMC1 joint distraction. Second, we assessed the number of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures at each follow-up time point. Furthermore, this study sought differences on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the CMC1 joint before and after distraction. Adverse events were noted and reported. Twenty patients (median age of 54 years) with symptomatic CMC1 OA and an established indication for a trapeziectomy were enrolled. An external distractor device was placed over the CMC1 joint and left in situ for 8 weeks. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), and grip strength were recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Two years after joint distraction, physical function and pain scores had improved significantly compared with baseline: DASH from 48 to 17, MHQ from 56 to 83, and VAS for pain from 50 to 18 mm. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) reached an MCID in DASH and MHQ scores. One patient was not satisfied with treatment outcome and chose to proceed with a trapeziectomy 14 months after initial distraction therapy. This study demonstrates that CMC1 joint distraction can postpone more invasive surgical interventions (e.g., trapeziectomy) for at least 2 years. Larger comparative studies are needed to assess the value of CMC1 joint distraction in the treatment of CMC1 OA. This is a Level IV, prospective case series study.
关节撑开术是一种针对有症状的拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎(第一腕掌关节骨关节炎,CMC1 OA)患者的相对较新的治疗方法。先前一项针对5名患者的初步研究表明,第一腕掌关节撑开术在技术上是可行的。本研究展示了20例患者接受第一腕掌关节撑开术并随访2年的结果。
主要研究目的是评估第一腕掌关节撑开术后2年,第一腕掌关节骨关节炎患者的身体功能是否更好,疼痛是否减轻。其次,我们评估了在每个随访时间点,患者报告结局量表中达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者数量。此外,本研究还探寻了撑开前后第一腕掌关节磁共振成像(MRI)的差异。记录并报告了不良事件。
招募了20例有症状的第一腕掌关节骨关节炎且有明确的小多角骨切除术指征的患者(中位年龄54岁)。在第一腕掌关节上方放置一个外部撑开装置,并原位保留8周。术前以及术后3、6、12和24个月记录手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、密歇根手部结局问卷(MHQ)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和握力。
关节撑开术后2年,与基线相比,身体功能和疼痛评分有显著改善:DASH评分从48降至17,MHQ评分从56升至83,疼痛VAS评分从50降至18 mm。19例患者中有14例(74%)在DASH和MHQ评分中达到MCID。1例患者对治疗结果不满意,在初次撑开治疗14个月后选择进行小多角骨切除术。
本研究表明,第一腕掌关节撑开术可将更具侵入性的手术干预(如小多角骨切除术)推迟至少2年。需要更大规模的对照研究来评估第一腕掌关节撑开术在治疗第一腕掌关节骨关节炎中的价值。
这是一项IV级前瞻性病例系列研究。