Department of Respiratory Therapy, School of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 199 Tun-Hwa N. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 9;16(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01738-x.
Postoperative positive pressure lung expansion is associated with decreased pulmonary complications and improved clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to compare the differences in post-operative pulmonary complications and clinical outcomes between two groups of study subjects who underwent cardiac surgery; one included subjects who received mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) and the other included subjects who received intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) therapy.
This retrospective study included 51 subjects, who underwent cardiac surgery in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital during the time period from June 2017 to February 2018. After liberation from mechanical ventilation, the subjects received lung expansion therapy by means of two types of positive pressure devices, MI-E (n = 21) or IPPB (n = 30). The pulmonary complications, lung function, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Subjects in both groups displayed similar baseline characteristics and underwent similar types of surgical procedures. Compared to subjects who received non-oscillatory therapy, those who received MI-E therapy had higher post-operative force vital capacity (58.4 ± 4.74% vs. 46.0 ± 3.70%, p = 0.042), forced expiratory volume in one second (62.4 ± 5.23% vs. 46.8 ± 3.83%, p = 0.017), and peak flow rate (67.1 ± 5.53 L vs. 55.7 ± 4.44 L p = 0.111). However, the incidence of chest pain was higher in the MI-E group (n = 13, 61.9%) than in the IPPB group (n = 4, 16.7%; odds ratio, 0.123, 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.002). The length of hospital and ICU stay, development of atelectasis, pneumonia, and pleural effusion were similar in both the groups.
Both IPPB and MI-E therapies have similar effects on preventing post-operative complications in cardiac surgery patients. However, compared to IPPB therapy, MI-E therapy was associated with better-preserved pulmonary function and higher incidence of chest pain.
术后正压肺膨胀与减少肺部并发症和改善临床结果有关。本研究的目的是比较两组接受心脏手术的研究对象之间术后肺部并发症和临床结果的差异;一组包括接受机械通气-呼气(MI-E)的研究对象,另一组包括接受间歇正压通气(IPPB)治疗的研究对象。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 2 月期间在一家三级医院重症监护病房接受心脏手术的 51 例患者。在从机械通气中解脱后,通过两种类型的正压设备对患者进行肺膨胀治疗,MI-E(n=21)或 IPPB(n=30)。比较两组患者的肺部并发症、肺功能和临床结果。
两组患者的基线特征相似,接受的手术类型也相似。与接受非振荡治疗的患者相比,接受 MI-E 治疗的患者术后用力肺活量(58.4±4.74%比 46.0±3.70%,p=0.042)、一秒用力呼气量(62.4±5.23%比 46.8±3.83%,p=0.017)和峰流速(67.1±5.53 L 比 55.7±4.44 L,p=0.111)更高。然而,MI-E 组(61.9%,n=13)胸痛发生率高于 IPPB 组(16.7%,n=4,比值比,0.123,95%置信区间,0.03-0.45;p=0.002)。两组患者的住院时间、ICU 住院时间、肺不张、肺炎和胸腔积液的发生情况相似。
IPPB 和 MI-E 治疗对预防心脏手术患者术后并发症的效果相似。然而,与 IPPB 治疗相比,MI-E 治疗与更好的肺功能保留和更高的胸痛发生率相关。