upfront 治疗:持续治疗的案例。

Upfront therapy: the case for continuous treatment.

机构信息

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):55-58. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2021000232.

Abstract

Both BTKi and BCL2i are regarded as standards of care for frontline treatment of CLL. In this paper, I present the arguments for favoring BTKi as initial therapy. Venetoclax-based regimens have the advantage of being fixed in duration, but patients with select high-risk features may experience inferior PFS relative to those without high-risk features.

摘要

BTKi 和 BCL2i 均被认为是 CLL 一线治疗的标准治疗方法。在本文中,我提出了赞成 BTKi 作为初始治疗的理由。基于 Venetoclax 的方案具有治疗时间固定的优势,但具有某些高危特征的患者与无高危特征的患者相比,PFS 可能较差。

相似文献

[1]
Upfront therapy: the case for continuous treatment.

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021-12-10

[4]
Frontline treatment in CLL: the case for time-limited treatment.

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021-12-10

[8]
Approaches for relapsed CLL after chemotherapy-free frontline regimens.

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020-12-4

[9]
Is there a role for anti-CD20 antibodies in CLL?

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021-12-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索