The Influence of Spatial Smoothing Kernel Size on the Whole-brain Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity and Meta-state Parameters.

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), spatial smoothing procedure is generally a stable step in the preprocessing stream. Previous research (including ours) suggested dependency of the static functional connectivity on the size of the spatial smoothing kernel size. But its impact on the time-varying patterns of functional connectivity has not been investigated. Here, we sought to identify the effects of spatial smoothing on brain dynamics by performing dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) and meta-state analysis, a unique approach capable of examining a higher-dimensional temporal dynamism of whole-brain functional connectivity. Gaussian smoothing kernel with different widths at half of the maximum of the height of the Gaussian (4, 8, and 12 mm FWHM) were used during preprocessing prior to the group independent component analysis (ICA) with a relatively high model order of 75. dFNC was conducted using the sliding-time window approach and k-means clustering algorithm. Meta-state dynamics method was performed by reducing the number of windowed FNC correlations using principal components analysis (PCA), temporal and spatial ICA and k-means. Results revealed robust effects of spatial smoothing on the connectivity dynamics of several network pairs including a variety of cognitive/attention networks in a connectivity state with the highest occurrence (FDR corrected-p < 0.01). Meta-state analyses indicated significant changes in meta-state metrics including the number of meta-states, meta-state changes, meta-state span, and the total distance. These changes were particularly pronounced when we compared resting state data smoothed with 8 vs. 12 mm FWHM. Our preliminary findings give insights into the effects of spatial smoothing kernel size on the dynamics of functional connectivity and its consequences on meta-state parameters. It also provides further indication of the importance of evaluating variance associated with preprocessing steps on analysis outcomes.