Suppr超能文献

依背景甲氨蝶呤剂量的生物初治活动性类风湿关节炎患者中阿巴西普的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、4 期研究的事后分析。

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis by background methotrexate dose: post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 4 study.

机构信息

The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Department of Orthopedics, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Apr 18;32(3):500-507. doi: 10.1093/mr/roab029.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by background methotrexate (MTX) dose.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 4 study (NCT01758198), patients received intravenous abatacept (∼10 mg/kg) or placebo both with MTX (≥6 mg/week). Efficacy (Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein [DAS28 (CRP)] and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) was assessed by baseline MTX dosage (≤8 and >8 mg/week) to week 16; safety was assessed by MTX dosage ≤8 and >8 mg/week. Change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI was assessed using longitudinal repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 101 and 102 patients received abatacept + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, while 96 and 106 patients received placebo + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, respectively. Regardless of baseline MTX dose received, mean changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI in abatacept groups were similar; repeated measures analysis showed similar trends in changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI. Abatacept safety profile was consistent with previous observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Post hoc analysis demonstrated similar efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve ACPA-positive Japanese patients with RA regardless of baseline MTX dose.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估背景甲氨蝶呤(MTX)剂量下,生物初治、抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)阳性的日本活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者使用阿巴西普的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 4 期研究(NCT01758198)的事后分析中,患者接受阿巴西普(约 10mg/kg)或安慰剂联合 MTX(≥6mg/周)治疗。通过基线 MTX 剂量(≤8mg/周和>8mg/周)评估疗效(基于 C 反应蛋白的 28 关节疾病活动度评分[DAS28(CRP)]和健康评估问卷残疾指数[HAQ-DI]),并于第 16 周进行评估;安全性评估根据 MTX 剂量≤8mg/周和>8mg/周进行。采用纵向重复测量分析评估从基线到 DAS28(CRP)和 HAQ-DI 的变化。

结果

总体而言,101 例和 102 例患者接受阿巴西普+MTX≤8mg/周和>8mg/周治疗,96 例和 106 例患者接受安慰剂+MTX≤8mg/周和>8mg/周治疗。无论基线 MTX 剂量如何,阿巴西普组的 DAS28(CRP)和 HAQ-DI 从基线的平均变化相似;重复测量分析显示,DAS28(CRP)和 HAQ-DI 从基线的变化趋势相似。阿巴西普的安全性特征与既往观察结果一致。

结论

事后分析表明,生物初治、ACPA 阳性的日本 RA 患者无论基线 MTX 剂量如何,阿巴西普的疗效和安全性相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验