Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Sex Med. 2022 Feb;19(2):170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
There are ongoing debates about conflicting models on how to conceptualize compulsive sexual behavior. At the heart of these discussions is the question about the sexual motivations underlying compulsive sexual behavior, as different models assume different motivations.
The aim of the present study was to understand sexual motivations underlying compulsive sexual behavior and their relation to the most prominent conceptualizations of compulsive sexual behavior (eg, compulsive sexual behavior disorder [CSBD], sex addiction).
We used self-reported data from 2 large samples of Hungarian and German populations (N = 9814). The Sexual Motivation Scale (SexMS), a 24-item self-report measure based on self-determination theory, was used to assess a diverse set of sexual motivations. Compulsive sexual behavior was assessed with the 19-item Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale (CSBD-19), that is based on the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines of CSBD. We used structural equation modeling to examine the hypothesized associations between sexual motivations and compulsive sexual behavior and examined potential gender differences in these associations.
Compulsive sexual behavior was assessed in relation to a set of sexual motivations.
Amotivation had the strongest positive association with compulsive sexual behavior, but integrated, introjected, and intrinsic motivations were also positively related to it. Importantly, these associations did not differ for women and men, and between the 2 samples.
Future research and treatment should also consider sexual motivations that are not listed among the ICD-11 guidelines for CSBD, including high levels of sexual interest, continuing the behavior despite having little satisfaction from it and coping with sex.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Although we used large samples of general populations in 2 Western countries, this motivational background of compulsive sexual behavior awaits replication in a clinical sample of individuals experiencing CSBD.
The identified sexual motivations underlying compulsive sexual behavior are relevant for assessing and treating patients as motivations may be integrated into psychotherapeutic interventions. Koós M, Fuss J, Klein V, et al. Sexual Motivations Underlying Compulsive Sexual Behavior in Women and Men From Germany and Hungary. J Sex Med 2022;19:170-181.
关于如何概念化强迫性行为,存在着相互矛盾的模型的争论。这些讨论的核心是强迫性行为背后的性动机问题,因为不同的模型假设了不同的动机。
本研究旨在了解强迫性行为背后的性动机及其与强迫性行为的最突出概念化(例如,强迫性性行为障碍[CSBD],性成瘾)的关系。
我们使用了来自匈牙利和德国两个大型人群的自我报告数据(N=9814)。性动机量表(SexMS)是一种基于自我决定理论的 24 项自我报告衡量标准,用于评估各种性动机。强迫性性行为使用 19 项强迫性性行为障碍量表(CSBD-19)进行评估,该量表基于 CSBD 的 ICD-11 诊断准则。我们使用结构方程模型来检验假设的性动机与强迫性性行为之间的关联,并检验这些关联在性别上的潜在差异。
强迫性性行为与一系列性动机相关联。
动机缺失与强迫性性行为呈最强的正相关,但整合、内摄和内在动机也与之呈正相关。重要的是,这些关联在女性和男性之间以及在两个样本之间没有差异。
未来的研究和治疗也应该考虑 ICD-11 中 CSBD 指南未列出的性动机,包括性兴趣高、尽管性行为满意度低但仍继续进行性行为以及用性行为来应对。
尽管我们使用了 2 个西方国家的一般人群的大型样本,但这种强迫性行为的动机背景仍有待在经历 CSBD 的临床样本中进行复制。
确定的强迫性行为背后的性动机对于评估和治疗患者很重要,因为动机可以被纳入心理治疗干预措施中。