Salman Mohamed A, Safina Ahmed, Salman Ahmed, Farah Mohamed, Noureldin Khaled, Issa Mohamed, Dorra Ahmed, Tourky Mohamed, Shaaban Hossam El-Din, Aradaib Mohammed
General Surgery, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY.
General surgery, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY.
Cureus. 2021 Dec 13;13(12):e20382. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20382. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Purpose We aimed to investigate the impact of reinforcement and abdominal drains on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The present study was a prospective study that included obese patients scheduled to undergo LSG. Patients were assigned to receive drain, reinforcement, or both according to the surgeon's preference and followed up for one month after surgery. The present study's primary outcome was the identification of the association between intraoperative drain/reinforcement and the incidence of postoperative complications. Results A total of 125 (20.3%) patients received intraoperative drains. The proportion of postoperative morbidity was comparable between the drain and non-drain groups (3.2% versus 1.6%; p = 0.25). Patients in the drain group had similar incidence of blood transfusion (2.4% versus 1.7% in non-drain group; p = 0.43) and postoperative leakage (0.8% versus 0.2% in non-drain group; p = 0.36). The incidences of blood transfusion (p = 0.56) and reoperation (p = 0.98) were comparable between the drain and non-drain groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the drain and non-drain groups regarding postoperative mortality and wound infection (p > 0.05). On the other hand, 440 (71.3%) patients received reinforcement. The proportion of postoperative morbidity was comparable between the reinforcement and non-reinforcement groups (1.6% versus 2.8%, p = 0.07). Patients in the reinforcement group were less likely to develop postoperative bleeding (0.7% versus 4% in the non-reinforcement group; p = 0.004), while no significant difference was detected in terms of postoperative leakage (p = 0.33) and in-hospital mortality. Conclusion In conclusion, abdominal drainage did not reduce the complications of LSG patients. Reinforcement has some role in controlling the bleeding but not leaks. Both techniques did not significantly impact the mortality rate. In the future, additional, large randomized trials are needed to examine the gastrointestinal-related quality of life.
目的 我们旨在研究引流管和加固措施对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)结局的影响。方法 本研究为前瞻性研究,纳入计划接受LSG的肥胖患者。根据外科医生的偏好,患者被分配接受引流管、加固措施或两者皆有,并在术后随访1个月。本研究的主要结局是确定术中引流管/加固措施与术后并发症发生率之间的关联。结果 共有125例(20.3%)患者术中接受了引流管。引流管组和非引流管组术后发病率相当(3.2%对1.6%;p = 0.25)。引流管组患者输血发生率(2.4%对非引流管组的1.7%;p = 0.43)和术后渗漏发生率(0.8%对非引流管组的0.2%;p = 0.36)相似。引流管组和非引流管组的输血发生率(p = 0.56)和再次手术发生率(p = 0.98)相当。引流管组和非引流管组在术后死亡率和伤口感染方面无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。另一方面,440例(71.3%)患者接受了加固措施。加固措施组和未加固措施组术后发病率相当(1.6%对2.8%,p = 0.07)。加固措施组患者术后出血的可能性较小(0.7%对未加固措施组的4%;p = 0.004),而在术后渗漏(p = 0.33)和住院死亡率方面未检测到显著差异。结论 总之,腹腔引流并未降低LSG患者的并发症。加固措施在控制出血方面有一定作用,但对渗漏无效。两种技术均未对死亡率产生显著影响。未来,需要更多大型随机试验来研究与胃肠道相关的生活质量。