Department of Social Security, School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100872, China.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, 100 Church Street South, Suite 199, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jun 13;37(6):677-689. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab153.
In the last two decades, developing countries have increasingly engaged in improving the governance of their health systems and promoting policy design to strengthen their health governance capacity. Although many well-designed national policy strategies have been promulgated, obstacles to policy implementation and compliance among localities may undermine these efforts, particularly in decentralized health systems. Studies on health governance have rarely adopted a central-local analysis to investigate in detail local governments' distinct experiences, orientations and dynamics in implementing the same national policy initiative. This study examines the policy orientations of prefectural governments in strengthening governance in health financing in China, which has transitioned from emphasizing the approach of fiscal resource input to that of marketization promotion and cost-containment regulation enforcement at the national level since 2009. Employing text-mining methodologies, we analysed health policy documents issued by multi-level governments after 2009. The analysis revealed three salient findings. Firstly, compared to higher-level authorities, prefectural governments generally opted to use fiscal resource input over marketization promotion and cost-containment regulation enforcement between 2009 and 2020. Secondly, policy choices of prefectural governments varied considerably in terms of enforcing cost-containment regulations during the same period. Thirdly, the extent of the prefectural government's orientation toward marketization promotion or cost-containment regulation enforcement was not only determined by the top-down orders of higher-level authorities but was also incentivized by the government's fiscal dependency and the policy orientations of peer governments. These findings contribute to the health governance literature by providing an overview of local discretion in policy choices and the political and fiscal dynamics of local policy orientations in promoting health governance in a decentralized health system.
在过去的二十年中,发展中国家越来越多地参与改善其卫生系统的治理,并推动政策设计以加强其卫生治理能力。尽管已经颁布了许多精心设计的国家政策战略,但地方在实施政策和遵守政策方面的障碍可能会破坏这些努力,特别是在分散的卫生系统中。卫生治理方面的研究很少采用中央-地方分析来详细研究地方政府在实施相同的国家政策倡议方面的独特经验、取向和动态。本研究考察了中国省级政府在加强卫生筹资治理方面的政策取向,中国自 2009 年以来已从强调财政资源投入的方法转变为强调市场化推进和成本控制监管的方法。本研究采用文本挖掘方法,分析了 2009 年后多层次政府发布的卫生政策文件。分析结果揭示了三个突出的发现。首先,与上级政府相比,省级政府在 2009 年至 2020 年期间,普遍倾向于采用财政资源投入而不是市场化推进和成本控制监管。其次,在同一时期,省级政府在实施成本控制法规方面的政策选择存在很大差异。第三,省级政府对市场化推进或成本控制监管的取向程度不仅取决于上级政府的自上而下的命令,还受到政府财政依赖和同级政府政策取向的激励。这些发现通过提供政策选择中的地方裁量权概述以及分散卫生系统中促进卫生治理的地方政策取向的政治和财政动态,为卫生治理文献做出了贡献。