Tscholakoff D, Hricak H, Thoeni R, Winkler M L, Margulis A R
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr;148(4):703-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.4.703.
MR imaging examinations of 20 patients with normal pancreas and of 38 patients with suspected pancreatic disease were analyzed retrospectively to evaluate the ability of MR imaging to depict the normal and abnormal pancreas, establish MR criteria for various pancreatic diseases, determine if MR imaging can distinguish among various pancreatic diseases, and compare the usefulness of MR imaging with CT. In all 20 patients with normal pancreas and in 34 of the 38 patients with suspected pancreatic disease excellent or good evaluation of the pancreas was achieved. A 0.35-T magnet (Diasonics MT/S) was used, and both T1- and T2-weighted images were needed. T1 and T2 relaxation times and MR signal intensities showed no specific pattern to allow consistent differentiation between normal and diseased pancreatic tissue or to distinguish between tumor and inflammation. In the 29 patients in whom MR and CT images could be compared, MR imaging and CT provided equivalent information in 20 (69%). In 4 patients (14%), MR imaging added information, and in 5 patients (17%) of cases, MR imaging yielded less information than CT. MR imaging of the pancreas was found to be superior to CT in selected instances, such as in the staging of pancreatic neoplasms (n = 4) and in the evaluation of pancreatic disease after surgery (n = 3). We conclude that, at present, MR imaging should not be used as the screening method for pancreatic disease but should be reserved as an adjunct when the information provided by CT is insufficient.
回顾性分析了20例胰腺正常患者和38例疑似胰腺疾病患者的磁共振成像(MR)检查结果,以评估MR成像描绘正常和异常胰腺的能力、建立各种胰腺疾病的MR标准、确定MR成像能否区分各种胰腺疾病,以及比较MR成像与计算机断层扫描(CT)的效用。在所有20例胰腺正常的患者以及38例疑似胰腺疾病患者中的34例中,胰腺得到了良好或优秀的评估。使用了一台0.35-T的磁体(Diasonics MT/S),并且需要T1加权和T2加权图像。T1和T2弛豫时间以及MR信号强度没有显示出特定模式,无法一致地区分正常和患病的胰腺组织,也无法区分肿瘤和炎症。在29例可比较MR和CT图像的患者中,MR成像和CT在20例(69%)中提供了等效信息。在4例(14%)患者中,MR成像提供了额外信息,在5例(17%)患者中,MR成像提供的信息少于CT。发现胰腺的MR成像在某些特定情况下优于CT,例如在胰腺肿瘤分期(n = 4)和术后胰腺疾病评估(n = 3)中。我们得出结论,目前,MR成像不应作为胰腺疾病的筛查方法,而应在CT提供的信息不足时作为辅助手段保留。