Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES (CB06/06/0058), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e27597. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027597.
Current data on the frequency and efficacy of linezolid (LNZ) in infective endocarditis (IE) are based on small retrospective series. We used a national database to evaluate the effectiveness of LNZ in IE.This is a retrospective study of IE patients in the Spanish GAMES database who received LNZ. We defined 3 levels of therapeutic impact: LNZ < 7 days, LNZ high-impact (≥ 7 days, > 50% of the total treatment, and > 50% of the LNZ doses prescribed in the first weeks of treatment), and LNZ ≥ 7 days not fulfilling the high-impact criteria (LNZ-NHI). Effectiveness of LNZ was assessed using propensity score matching and multivariate analysis of high-impact cases in comparison to patients not treated with LNZ from the GAMES database matched for age-adjusted comorbidity Charlson index, heart failure, renal failure, prosthetic and intracardiac IE device, left-sided IE, and Staphylococcus aureus. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included IE complications and relapses.From 3467 patients included in the GAMES database, 295 (8.5%) received LNZ. After excluding 3 patients, 292 were grouped as follows for the analyses: 99 (33.9%) patients in LNZ < 7 days, 11 (3.7%) in LNZ high-impact, and 178 (61%) in LNZ-NHI. In-hospital mortality was 51.5%, 54.4%, and 19.1% respectively. In the propensity analysis, LNZ high-impact group presented with respect to matched controls not treated with LNZ higher in-hospital mortality (54.5% vs 18.2%, P = .04). The multivariate analysis showed an independent relationship of LNZ use with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 9.06, 95% confidence interval 1.15--71.08, P = .03).Treatment with LNZ is relatively frequent, but most cases do not fulfill our high-impact criteria. Our data suggest that the use of LNZ as definitive treatment in IE may be associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
目前有关感染性心内膜炎(IE)中利奈唑胺(LNZ)的频率和疗效的数据基于小的回顾性系列研究。我们使用国家数据库评估 LNZ 在 IE 中的有效性。
这是一项在西班牙 GAMES 数据库中接受 LNZ 治疗的 IE 患者的回顾性研究。我们定义了 3 个治疗影响水平:LNZ<7 天、LNZ 高影响(≥7 天、>总治疗的 50%和>治疗前几周规定的 LNZ 剂量的 50%)和 LNZ≥7 天不符合高影响标准(LNZ-NHI)。使用倾向评分匹配和多元分析比较了 GAMES 数据库中未接受 LNZ 治疗的患者和符合年龄调整后的合并症 Charlson 指数、心力衰竭、肾衰竭、人工和心内 IE 装置、左侧 IE 和金黄色葡萄球菌的高影响病例的治疗效果。主要结局是住院死亡率和一年死亡率。次要结局包括 IE 并发症和复发。
从 GAMES 数据库中纳入的 3467 例患者中,295 例(8.5%)接受了 LNZ。排除 3 例患者后,292 例患者分为以下几类进行分析:99 例(33.9%)患者 LNZ<7 天,11 例(3.7%)患者 LNZ 高影响,178 例(61%)患者 LNZ-NHI。住院死亡率分别为 51.5%、54.4%和 19.1%。在倾向分析中,与未接受 LNZ 治疗的匹配对照相比,LNZ 高影响组的住院死亡率更高(54.5%比 18.2%,P=0.04)。多变量分析显示 LNZ 使用与住院死亡率之间存在独立关系(比值比 9.06,95%置信区间 1.15-71.08,P=0.03)。
LNZ 的治疗相对频繁,但大多数病例不符合我们的高影响标准。我们的数据表明,IE 中作为确定性治疗的 LNZ 使用可能与较高的住院死亡率相关。