University of Michigan.
University of Maryland.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;34(10):1866-1891. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01801.
Accumulating literature has linked poverty to brain structure and function, particularly in affective neural regions; however, few studies have examined associations with structural connections or the importance of developmental timing of exposure. Moreover, prior neuroimaging studies have not used a proximal measure of poverty (i.e., material hardship, which assesses food, housing, and medical insecurity) to capture the lived experience of growing up in harsh economic conditions. The present investigation addressed these gaps collectively by examining the associations between material hardship (ages 1, 3, 5, 9, and 15 years) and white matter connectivity of frontolimbic structures (age 15 years) in a low-income sample. We applied probabilistic tractography to diffusion imaging data collected from 194 adolescents. Results showed that material hardship related to amygdala-prefrontal, but not hippocampus-prefrontal or hippocampus-amygdala, white matter connectivity. Specifically, hardship during middle childhood (ages 5 and 9 years) was associated with greater connectivity between the amygdala and dorsomedial pFC, whereas hardship during adolescence (age 15 years) was related to reduced amygdala-orbitofrontal (OFC) and greater amygdala-subgenual ACC connectivity. Growth curve analyses showed that greater increases of hardship across time were associated with both greater (amygdala-subgenual ACC) and reduced (amygdala-OFC) white matter connectivity. Furthermore, these effects remained above and beyond other types of adversity, and greater hardship and decreased amygdala-OFC connectivity were related to increased anxiety and depressive symptoms. Results demonstrate that the associations between material hardship and white matter connections differ across key prefrontal regions and developmental periods, providing support for potential windows of plasticity for structural circuits that support emotion processing.
越来越多的文献将贫困与大脑结构和功能联系起来,尤其是在情感神经区域;然而,很少有研究探讨与结构连接的关联,或暴露的发展时机的重要性。此外,先前的神经影像学研究没有使用贫困的近端测量(即物质困难,评估食物、住房和医疗保障不足)来捕捉在恶劣经济条件下成长的生活经历。本研究通过检查物质困难(1 岁、3 岁、5 岁、9 岁和 15 岁)与前额叶结构白质连接(15 岁)之间的关联,共同解决了这些空白。我们应用概率追踪技术对 194 名青少年的扩散成像数据进行了分析。结果表明,物质困难与杏仁核-前额叶的白质连接有关,而与海马体-前额叶或海马体-杏仁核的白质连接无关。具体来说,儿童中期(5 岁和 9 岁)的困难与杏仁核和背内侧前额叶之间的连接增加有关,而青春期(15 岁)的困难与杏仁核-眶额皮质(OFC)和杏仁核-前扣带回皮质(ACC)的连接减少有关。增长曲线分析表明,随着时间的推移,困难程度的增加与更大的(杏仁核-前扣带回皮质)和更小的(杏仁核-OFC)白质连接有关。此外,这些影响超出了其他类型的逆境,更大的困难和减少的杏仁核-OFC 连接与更高的焦虑和抑郁症状有关。研究结果表明,物质困难与白质连接之间的关联在关键的前额叶区域和发展阶段存在差异,为支持情绪处理的结构回路的潜在可塑性窗口提供了支持。