Suppr超能文献

用于无细胞快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体的 BZ COVID-19 中和抗体检测的性能评估

Performance Evaluation of the BZ COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibody Test for the Culture-Free and Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.

作者信息

Jung Bo Kyeung, Yoon Jung, Bae Joon-Yong, Kim Jeonghun, Park Man-Seong, Lee Suk Yong, Lim Chae Seung

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 08308, Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;11(12):2193. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122193.

Abstract

Rapid and accurate measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) can aid in understanding the development of immunity against COVID-19. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 nAb detection test called the BZ COVID-19 nAb test BZ-nAb (BZ-nAb; BioZentech). Using the 90% plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT-90) as a reference, 104 serum specimens collected from COVID-19-positive and -negative patients were grouped into 40 PRNT-90-positive and 64 PRNT-90-negative specimens. The performance of the BZ-nAb was compared with that of the cPass surrogate virus neutralization test (cPass sVNT; Genscript). The BZ-nAb showed a sensitivity ranging from 92.5%-95.0% and specificity ranging from 96.9%-100%, whereas cPass sVNT showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5%-100%) and specificity of 98.4% (95% CI, 91.6%-100%). The dilution factor obtained with PRNT-90 showed a stronger correlation with the percent inhibition of cPass sVNT (r = 0.8660, < 0.001) compared with the test and control line ratio (T/C ratio) of the BZ-nAb (r = -0.7089, < 0.001). An almost perfect agreement was seen between the BZ-nAb and cPass sVNT results, with a strong negative correlation between the BZ-nAb T/C ratio and cPass sVNT percent inhibition (r = -0.8022, < 0.001). In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of the BZ-nAb was comparable to that of the cPass sVNT, although the BZ-nAb had a slightly lower sensitivity.

摘要

快速准确地测量严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)中和抗体(nAbs)有助于了解针对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的免疫发展情况。本研究评估了一种名为BZ COVID-19 nAb检测(BZ-nAb;BioZentech)的快速SARS-CoV-2 nAb检测方法的诊断性能。以90%蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT-90)为参考,将从COVID-19阳性和阴性患者中收集的104份血清标本分为40份PRNT-90阳性标本和64份PRNT-90阴性标本。将BZ-nAb的性能与cPass替代病毒中和试验(cPass sVNT;金斯瑞)的性能进行了比较。BZ-nAb的灵敏度为92.5%-95.0%,特异性为96.9%-100%,而cPass sVNT的灵敏度为100%(95%置信区间(CI)90.5%-100%),特异性为98.4%(95%CI,91.6%-100%)。与BZ-nAb的检测线与对照线比值(T/C比值)(r = -0.7089,<0.001)相比,PRNT-90获得的稀释倍数与cPass sVNT的抑制百分比显示出更强的相关性(r = 0.8660,<0.001)。BZ-nAb和cPass sVNT结果之间观察到几乎完美的一致性,BZ-nAb T/C比值与cPass sVNT抑制百分比之间存在强烈的负相关(r = -0.8022,<0.001)。总之,BZ-nAb的诊断性能与cPass sVNT相当,尽管BZ-nAb的灵敏度略低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd5/8700253/7297a31b0593/diagnostics-11-02193-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验