López-Pintor Jose Maria, Sánchez-López Javier, Navarro-San Francisco Carolina, Sánchez-Díaz Ana Maria, Loza Elena, Cantón Rafael
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;10(12):1511. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121511.
Accelerating the diagnosis of bacteremia is one of the biggest challenges in clinical microbiology departments. The fast establishment of a correct treatment is determinant on bacteremic patients' outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes of a rapid blood culture workflow protocol in positive blood cultures with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB).
A quasi-experimental before-after study was performed with two groups: (i) control group (conventional work-protocol) and (ii) intervention group (rapid workflow-protocol: rapid identification by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time-Of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) from bacterial pellet without overnight incubation). Patients were divided into different categories according to the type of intervention over treatment. Outcomes were compared between both groups.
A total of 313 patients with GNB-bacteremia were included: 125 patients in the control group and 188 in the intervention. The time from positive blood culture to intervention on antibiotic treatment decreased from 2.0 days in the control group to 1.0 in the intervention group ( < 0.001). On the maintenance of correct empirical treatment, the control group reported 2.0 median days until the clinical decision, while in the intervention group was 1.0 ( < 0.001). In the case of treatment de-escalation, a significant difference between both groups (4.0 vs. 2.0, < 0.001) was found. A decreasing trend on the change from inappropriate treatments to appropriate ones was observed: 3.5 vs. 1.5; = 0.12. No significant differences were found between both groups on 7-days mortality or on readmissions in the first 30-days.
Routine implementation of a rapid workflow protocol anticipates the report of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results in patients with GNB-bacteremia, decreasing the time to effective and optimal antibiotic therapy.
加快菌血症的诊断是临床微生物科面临的最大挑战之一。迅速确立正确的治疗方案对于菌血症患者的预后至关重要。我们的目标是评估抗菌治疗的影响以及快速血培养工作流程方案对革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)血培养阳性患者临床结局的影响。
进行了一项前后对照的准实验研究,分为两组:(i)对照组(传统工作流程方案)和(ii)干预组(快速工作流程方案:通过基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF)快速鉴定,并对细菌沉淀进行抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST),无需过夜培养)。根据治疗干预类型将患者分为不同类别。比较两组的结局。
共纳入313例GNB菌血症患者:对照组125例,干预组188例。从血培养阳性到开始抗生素治疗的时间从对照组的2.0天降至干预组的1.0天(<0.001)。在维持正确的经验性治疗方面,对照组报告临床决策的中位天数为2.0天,而干预组为1.0天(<0.001)。在治疗降阶梯方面,两组之间存在显著差异(4.0对2.0,<0.001)。观察到从不适当治疗转变为适当治疗的变化呈下降趋势:3.5对1.5;P = 0.12。两组在7天死亡率或前30天再入院率方面未发现显著差异。
快速工作流程方案的常规实施可提前报告GNB菌血症患者的抗菌药物敏感性试验结果,减少有效和最佳抗生素治疗的时间。