Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;79(4):323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
Our study objectives were to describe patterns of video laryngoscope screen visualization during tracheal intubation in a pediatric emergency department (ED) and to determine their associations with procedural performance.
We conducted a prospective, observational, video-based study of pediatric ED patients undergoing tracheal intubation with a standard geometry video laryngoscope (Storz C-MAC; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). Our primary exposure was video screen visualization patterns, measured by the percentage of each attempt spent viewing the screen and the number of times the proceduralist changed their gaze between the patient and screen (gaze switches). Our primary outcome was first-pass success. We compared measures of screen visualization between successful and unsuccessful first attempts using a generalized linear mixed model.
From December 2019 to October 2021, we collected data on 153 patients. The first-pass success rate was 79.1%. Proceduralists viewed the video screen during 80.4% of attempts; the median percentage of each attempt spent viewing the video screen was 42.1% (interquartile range 8.7% to 65.5%). The median number of gaze switches per attempt was 3 (interquartile range 1 to 6, maximum 22). The percentage of each attempt spent viewing the video screen was not associated with success (adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.08); additional gaze switches were associated with a lower likelihood of success (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.90).
We found wide variation in how proceduralists viewed the video laryngoscope screen during intubations in a pediatric ED. We illustrate the application of 2 objective screen visualization measures to quantify and understand how clinicians actually use video laryngoscopy.
本研究旨在描述儿科急诊(ED)中气管插管过程中视频喉镜屏幕可视化的模式,并确定其与操作性能的关联。
我们对在儿科 ED 中使用标准几何形状视频喉镜(Karl Storz,Tuttlingen,德国的 Storz C-MAC)进行气管插管的患儿进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、基于视频的研究。我们的主要暴露因素是视频屏幕可视化模式,通过每次尝试观察屏幕的时间百分比和术者在患者和屏幕之间改变视线的次数(视线切换)来衡量。我们的主要结局是首次通过成功率。我们使用广义线性混合模型比较了成功和不成功的首次尝试之间的屏幕可视化测量值。
从 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 10 月,我们收集了 153 名患者的数据。首次通过成功率为 79.1%。术者在 80.4%的尝试中观察了视频屏幕;每次尝试观察视频屏幕的中位数百分比为 42.1%(四分位距 8.7%至 65.5%)。每次尝试的平均视线切换次数为 3 次(四分位距 1 至 6,最大值 22)。每次尝试观察视频屏幕的时间百分比与成功率无关(调整后的优势比 1.00,95%置信区间 0.93 至 1.08);额外的视线切换与成功率降低相关(调整后的优势比 0.80,95%置信区间 0.71 至 0.90)。
我们发现术者在儿科 ED 进行插管时观察视频喉镜屏幕的方式存在很大差异。我们展示了使用 2 种客观的屏幕可视化测量方法来量化和理解临床医生实际使用视频喉镜的情况。