• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期肝细胞癌患者接受PD-1抑制剂治疗后的疗效评估与生存预测:RECIST 1.1、iRECIST和mRECIST标准的比较

Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction Following PD-1 Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST Criteria.

作者信息

Zhou Meng, Zhang Chunhui, Nie Jianhua, Sun Yajuan, Xu Ye, Wu Fangfang, Huang Yuhong, Li Shun, Wang Yuan, Zhou Yang, Zheng Tongsen

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 9;11:764189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.764189. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.764189
PMID:34956885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8697350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Precise evaluation of the efficacy of immunotherapy is critical in the effective management and treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the response assessments achieved by different criteria and to evaluate the correlation between survival outcome and response assessment in HCC treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor.

METHODS

Fifty patients with advanced HCC treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitor with baseline and follow-up CT images were analyzed. The patients were categorized into responders and nonresponders according to the criteria.

RESULTS

When the response assessments between RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST were compared, no statistically significant differences were observed. Overall response rate was 16% by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST and was 24% by mRECIST. According to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not statistically different between the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) groups and the stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) groups. The OS and PFS were significantly different between responders and nonresponders according to mRECIST. The Cohen's Kappa for RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST was 0.534, 0.438, and 0.363, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The mRECIST criteria have a powerful ability to discriminate between responders and nonresponders and demonstrated significantly longer OS and PFS in responders than in nonresponders. However, mRECIST needs to be further improved in order for it to be widely used in the clinical evaluation of immunotherapy in HCC.

摘要

背景

准确评估免疫疗法的疗效对于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的有效管理和治疗至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是比较不同标准所达成的疗效评估,并评估程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD - 1)抑制剂治疗的HCC患者生存结局与疗效评估之间的相关性。

方法

分析了50例接受一线PD - 1抑制剂治疗且有基线和随访CT图像的晚期HCC患者。根据标准将患者分为反应者和无反应者。

结果

比较RECIST 1.1和mRECIST的疗效评估时,未观察到统计学上的显著差异。根据RECIST 1.1和iRECIST,总体缓解率为16%,根据mRECIST为24%。根据RECIST 1.1和mRECIST,完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR)组与疾病稳定(SD)和疾病进展(PD)组之间的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)在统计学上无差异。根据mRECIST,反应者和无反应者之间的OS和PFS有显著差异。RECIST 1.1、iRECIST和mRECIST的 Cohen's Kappa分别为0.534、0.438和0.363。

结论

mRECIST标准在区分反应者和无反应者方面具有强大能力,并且显示反应者的OS和PFS明显长于无反应者。然而,mRECIST需要进一步改进,以便在HCC免疫疗法的临床评估中广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/56dac2e7ca3d/fonc-11-764189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/1d9023d80c15/fonc-11-764189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/4ecbe7b23953/fonc-11-764189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/bc9bb46d0aeb/fonc-11-764189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/56dac2e7ca3d/fonc-11-764189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/1d9023d80c15/fonc-11-764189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/4ecbe7b23953/fonc-11-764189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/bc9bb46d0aeb/fonc-11-764189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction Following PD-1 Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST Criteria.晚期肝细胞癌患者接受PD-1抑制剂治疗后的疗效评估与生存预测:RECIST 1.1、iRECIST和mRECIST标准的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 9;11:764189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.764189. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparative assessment of standard and immune response criteria for evaluation of response to PD-1 monotherapy in unresectable HCC.不可切除 HCC 中 PD-1 单药治疗反应评估的标准和免疫反应标准的比较评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Mar;47(3):969-980. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03386-0. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria for evaluating treatment response and survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.用于评估接受阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗的肝细胞癌患者治疗反应和生存结果的RECIST 1.1、mRECIST和Choi标准。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb;35(2):684-694. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10986-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Comparison of tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma.索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌患者的实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)和改良 RECIST 肿瘤反应比较。
Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;118(1):147-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26255. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
5
Initial response to sorafenib by using enhancement criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.使用增强标准评估肝细胞癌患者对索拉非尼的初始反应。
Hepatol Int. 2013 Jun;7(2):703-13. doi: 10.1007/s12072-013-9425-4. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
6
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods.PD-1 免疫治疗后非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效评估和生存预测:评估方法比较。
J Nucl Med. 2021 Jul 1;62(7):926-933. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254508. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Comparison of RECIST and iRECIST criteria in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with nivolumab.比较纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期肺癌患者时 RECIST 和 iRECIST 标准。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1456_21.
8
Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.实体瘤改良疗效评价标准在评估晚期肝细胞癌患者对索拉非尼的疗效方面优于实体瘤疗效评价标准。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 26;8:609. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1565-2.
9
mRECIST to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two randomised phase II trials comparing nintedanib vs sorafenib.mRECIST 预测晚期肝细胞癌的生存:比较尼达尼布与索拉非尼的两项随机 II 期试验分析。
Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1047-1055. doi: 10.1111/liv.13359. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.肿瘤空洞对评估抗 PD-1 或 PD-L1 抑制剂治疗晚期肺鳞癌临床获益的影响。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Jan;25(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable and unresectable, embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma.免疫检查点抑制剂联合疗法在可切除和不可切除、适合栓塞治疗的肝细胞癌中的作用
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;17:17588359251357719. doi: 10.1177/17588359251357719. eCollection 2025.
2
Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.选择性内放射治疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝细胞癌:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09139-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods.PD-1 免疫治疗后非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效评估和生存预测:评估方法比较。
J Nucl Med. 2021 Jul 1;62(7):926-933. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254508. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Phase Ib Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的 Ib 期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):2960-2970. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00808. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Comparison of the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (iRECIST) with RECIST for capturing treatment response of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.
Quantifying morphologic variations as an alternate to standard response criteria for unresectable primary liver tumors after checkpoint inhibition therapy.
量化形态学变化,作为检查点抑制治疗后不可切除原发性肝癌标准反应标准的替代方法。
Radiol Med. 2025 Feb;130(2):226-234. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01937-1. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
Tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy: imaging biomarkers for clinical decision-making.免疫疗法治疗肝细胞癌的肿瘤反应评估:用于临床决策的影像生物标志物
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):73-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10955-6. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen in advanced colorectal cancer after deep hyperthermia: a single-center retrospective study.深部热疗后mFOLFOX6联合贝伐单抗方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 5;13:1259713. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259713. eCollection 2023.
6
Overview of approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer.肺癌真实世界疾病进展评估方法概述。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Oct 31;7(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad074.
7
Immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: finally in clinical practice.用于治疗肝细胞癌的免疫疗法:终于应用于临床实践。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Apr 10;12(2):252-255. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-97. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Efficacy and safety analysis of TACE + sunitinib vs. sunitinib in the treatment of unresectable advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.TACE+舒尼替尼与舒尼替尼治疗不可切除的晚期肾细胞癌的疗效和安全性分析:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 24;23(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10754-0.
9
TACE versus TACE + entecavir versus TACE + tenofovir in the treatment of HBV associated hepatocellular carcinoma.经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)对比 TACE+恩替卡韦对比 TACE+替诺福韦治疗乙型肝炎相关肝细胞癌。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10694-9.
比较免疫治疗实体瘤反应评估标准(iRECIST)与 RECIST 用于评估帕博利珠单抗治疗转移性尿路上皮癌患者的治疗反应。
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):90-95. doi: 10.1111/bju.15176. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
Comparison of iRECIST versus RECIST V.1.1 in patients treated with an anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody: pooled FDA analysis.iRECIST 与 RECIST V.1.1 在抗 PD-1 或 PD-L1 抗体治疗患者中的比较:FDA 汇总分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000146.
5
mRECIST for HCC: Performance and novel refinements.肝癌的改良RECIST标准:性能与新改进
J Hepatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):288-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.09.026.
6
Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.帕博利珠单抗作为 KEYNOTE-240 中晚期肝细胞癌二线治疗的疗效:一项随机、双盲、III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):193-202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: Role of PFS as a surrogate of survival.晚期 HCC 的随机试验和终点:PFS 作为生存替代指标的作用。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jun;70(6):1262-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
8
Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial.帕博利珠单抗治疗索拉非尼治疗后晚期肝细胞癌患者(KEYNOTE-224):一项非随机、开放标签的 2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):940-952. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
9
Inter-operator variability and source of errors in tumour response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌肿瘤反应评估中操作者间变异性和误差源。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3611-3620. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5393-3. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade.使用免疫检查点阻断的癌症免疫疗法。
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060. Epub 2018 Mar 22.