文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

晚期肝细胞癌患者接受PD-1抑制剂治疗后的疗效评估与生存预测:RECIST 1.1、iRECIST和mRECIST标准的比较

Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction Following PD-1 Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST Criteria.

作者信息

Zhou Meng, Zhang Chunhui, Nie Jianhua, Sun Yajuan, Xu Ye, Wu Fangfang, Huang Yuhong, Li Shun, Wang Yuan, Zhou Yang, Zheng Tongsen

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 9;11:764189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.764189. eCollection 2021.


DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.764189
PMID:34956885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8697350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise evaluation of the efficacy of immunotherapy is critical in the effective management and treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the response assessments achieved by different criteria and to evaluate the correlation between survival outcome and response assessment in HCC treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor. METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced HCC treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitor with baseline and follow-up CT images were analyzed. The patients were categorized into responders and nonresponders according to the criteria. RESULTS: When the response assessments between RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST were compared, no statistically significant differences were observed. Overall response rate was 16% by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST and was 24% by mRECIST. According to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not statistically different between the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) groups and the stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) groups. The OS and PFS were significantly different between responders and nonresponders according to mRECIST. The Cohen's Kappa for RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST was 0.534, 0.438, and 0.363, respectively. CONCLUSION: The mRECIST criteria have a powerful ability to discriminate between responders and nonresponders and demonstrated significantly longer OS and PFS in responders than in nonresponders. However, mRECIST needs to be further improved in order for it to be widely used in the clinical evaluation of immunotherapy in HCC.

摘要

背景:准确评估免疫疗法的疗效对于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的有效管理和治疗至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是比较不同标准所达成的疗效评估,并评估程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD - 1)抑制剂治疗的HCC患者生存结局与疗效评估之间的相关性。 方法:分析了50例接受一线PD - 1抑制剂治疗且有基线和随访CT图像的晚期HCC患者。根据标准将患者分为反应者和无反应者。 结果:比较RECIST 1.1和mRECIST的疗效评估时,未观察到统计学上的显著差异。根据RECIST 1.1和iRECIST,总体缓解率为16%,根据mRECIST为24%。根据RECIST 1.1和mRECIST,完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR)组与疾病稳定(SD)和疾病进展(PD)组之间的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)在统计学上无差异。根据mRECIST,反应者和无反应者之间的OS和PFS有显著差异。RECIST 1.1、iRECIST和mRECIST的 Cohen's Kappa分别为0.534、0.438和0.363。 结论:mRECIST标准在区分反应者和无反应者方面具有强大能力,并且显示反应者的OS和PFS明显长于无反应者。然而,mRECIST需要进一步改进,以便在HCC免疫疗法的临床评估中广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/56dac2e7ca3d/fonc-11-764189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/1d9023d80c15/fonc-11-764189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/4ecbe7b23953/fonc-11-764189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/bc9bb46d0aeb/fonc-11-764189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/56dac2e7ca3d/fonc-11-764189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/1d9023d80c15/fonc-11-764189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/4ecbe7b23953/fonc-11-764189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/bc9bb46d0aeb/fonc-11-764189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9c/8697350/a4a6e5d94c95/fonc-11-764189-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction Following PD-1 Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1, iRECIST, and mRECIST Criteria.

Front Oncol. 2021-12-9

[2]
Comparative assessment of standard and immune response criteria for evaluation of response to PD-1 monotherapy in unresectable HCC.

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022-3

[3]
RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria for evaluating treatment response and survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Eur Radiol. 2025-2

[4]
Comparison of tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cancer. 2011-6-28

[5]
Initial response to sorafenib by using enhancement criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatol Int. 2013-6

[6]
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods.

J Nucl Med. 2021-7-1

[7]
Comparison of RECIST and iRECIST criteria in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

J Cancer Res Ther. 2023

[8]
Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BMC Res Notes. 2015-10-26

[9]
mRECIST to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two randomised phase II trials comparing nintedanib vs sorafenib.

Liver Int. 2017-2-2

[10]
Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Clin Lung Cancer. 2024-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable and unresectable, embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025-7-24

[2]
Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

Dig Dis Sci. 2025-6-26

[3]
Quantifying morphologic variations as an alternate to standard response criteria for unresectable primary liver tumors after checkpoint inhibition therapy.

Radiol Med. 2025-2

[4]
Tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy: imaging biomarkers for clinical decision-making.

Eur Radiol. 2025-1

[5]
Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen in advanced colorectal cancer after deep hyperthermia: a single-center retrospective study.

Front Oncol. 2023-12-5

[6]
Overview of approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer.

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023-10-31

[7]
Immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: finally in clinical practice.

Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023-4-10

[8]
Efficacy and safety analysis of TACE + sunitinib vs. sunitinib in the treatment of unresectable advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BMC Cancer. 2023-3-24

[9]
TACE versus TACE + entecavir versus TACE + tenofovir in the treatment of HBV associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

BMC Cancer. 2023-3-13

本文引用的文献

[1]
Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods.

J Nucl Med. 2021-7-1

[2]
Phase Ib Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

J Clin Oncol. 2020-9-10

[3]
Comparison of the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (iRECIST) with RECIST for capturing treatment response of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.

BJU Int. 2021-1

[4]
Comparison of iRECIST versus RECIST V.1.1 in patients treated with an anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody: pooled FDA analysis.

J Immunother Cancer. 2020-2

[5]
mRECIST for HCC: Performance and novel refinements.

J Hepatol. 2020-2

[6]
Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.

J Clin Oncol. 2019-12-2

[7]
Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: Role of PFS as a surrogate of survival.

J Hepatol. 2019-3-31

[8]
Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2018-6-3

[9]
Inter-operator variability and source of errors in tumour response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Eur Radiol. 2018-4-9

[10]
Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade.

Science. 2018-3-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索