Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
These authors contributed equally to this article.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 28;83(1):20m13850. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13850.
To describe persistence with and adherence to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly injection (PP1M) compared to oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in patients with schizophrenia in real-world settings in China and Japan. Patients with a schizophrenia diagnosis (: F20.x) who received oral or injectable antipsychotics from study start (China: January 1, 2012; Japan: January 1, 2014) until December 31, 2017, were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The first PP1M or oral SGA prescription date during the study period was defined as the index date. Eligible patients were followed up for up to 1 year after the index date. Persistence was measured from the index date until discontinuation or reaching 1 year. Adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC). Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. The study cohorts comprised 44,266 patients from Japan and 7,564 and 5,189 patients, respectively, from 2 hospitals in China. The PP1M group showed consistently lower risk of discontinuation; adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs were 0.75 (0.72-0.90) (Japan), and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) and 0.65 (0.56-0.76) (China) compared to oral SGAs. The PP1M group also showed better adherence; adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.61 (1.22-2.11) (Japan), and 1.92 (1.53-2.41) and 2.25 (1.58-3.23) (China). Persistence and adherence were significantly higher in PP1M users than in oral SGAs users across 3 databases comprising patients in 2 countries in Asia.
描述在中国和日本的真实世界环境中,与第二代口服抗精神病药物(SGAs)相比,精神分裂症患者使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮每月 1 次注射(PP1M)的持续性和依从性。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了从研究开始(中国:2012 年 1 月 1 日;日本:2014 年 1 月 1 日)至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受口服或注射抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症诊断患者(F20.x)。研究期间首次使用 PP1M 或口服 SGA 的日期定义为索引日期。符合条件的患者在索引日期后最多随访 1 年。从索引日期开始,直到停药或达到 1 年,测量持续性。通过计算覆盖天数比例(PDC)评估依从性。使用多变量回归模型调整潜在混杂因素。研究队列包括来自日本的 44266 例患者,以及分别来自中国的 2 家医院的 7564 例和 5189 例患者。与口服 SGAs 相比,PP1M 组停药风险始终较低;调整后的危险比和 95%置信区间分别为 0.75(0.72-0.90)(日本)和 0.76(0.68-0.84)和 0.65(0.56-0.76)(中国)。PP1M 组的依从性也更好;调整后的优势比和 95%置信区间分别为 1.61(1.22-2.11)(日本)和 1.92(1.53-2.41)和 2.25(1.58-3.23)(中国)。在包括亚洲 2 个国家的 3 个数据库中,PP1M 使用者的持续性和依从性均显著高于口服 SGA 使用者。