• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人创伤性上肢截肢后的神经康复:范围综述。

Neurorehabilitation in Adults With Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputation: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Division of Physical Therapy, 1371Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

School of Biological Sciences, 1372Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Mar;36(3):208-216. doi: 10.1177/15459683211070277. Epub 2021 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1177/15459683211070277
PMID:34967259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most of the current literature around amputation focuses on lower extremity amputation or engineering aspects of prosthetic devices. There is a need to more clearly understand neurobehavioral mechanisms related to upper extremity amputation and how such mechanisms might influence recovery and utilization of prostheses.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on adult traumatic upper limb amputation in regard to recovery and functional outcomes and how neuroplasticity might influence these findings.

METHODS

We identified appropriate articles using Academic Search Complete EBSCO, OVID Medline, and Cochrane databases. The resulting articles were then exported, screened, and reviewed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

RESULTS

Eleven (11) studies met the study criteria. Of these studies, 7 focused on sensory involvement, 3 focused on neuroplastic changes post-amputation related to functional impact, and 1 study focused on motor control and learning post-amputation. Overall, these studies revealed an incomplete understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in motor rehabilitation in the central and peripheral nervous systems, while also demonstrating the value of an individualized approach to neurorehabilitation in upper limb loss.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a gap in our understanding of the role of neurorehabilitation following amputation. Overall, focused rehabilitation parameters, demographic information, and clarity around central and peripheral neural mechanisms are needed in future research to address neurobehavioral mechanisms to promote functional recovery following traumatic upper extremity amputation.

摘要

背景

目前大多数关于截肢的文献都集中在下肢截肢或假肢工程方面。需要更清楚地了解与上肢截肢相关的神经行为机制,以及这些机制如何影响假肢的康复和使用。

目的

本范围综述旨在确定和总结有关成人外伤性上肢截肢的现有文献,重点关注康复和功能结果,以及神经可塑性如何影响这些发现。

方法

我们使用 Academic Search Complete EBSCO、OVID Medline 和 Cochrane 数据库来识别和筛选合适的文章。然后,根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南,导出、筛选和审查这些文章。

结果

有 11 项研究符合研究标准。其中 7 项研究关注感觉参与,3 项研究关注与功能影响相关的截肢后神经可塑性变化,1 项研究关注截肢后运动控制和学习。总体而言,这些研究揭示了我们对中枢和外周神经系统中运动康复所涉及的神经机制的理解不完整,同时也证明了针对上肢丧失的个体化神经康复方法的价值。

结论

我们对截肢后神经康复的作用理解存在差距。总体而言,未来的研究需要重点关注康复参数、人口统计学信息以及中枢和外周神经机制的清晰度,以解决神经行为机制问题,促进外伤性上肢截肢后的功能康复。

相似文献

1
Neurorehabilitation in Adults With Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputation: A Scoping Review.成人创伤性上肢截肢后的神经康复:范围综述。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Mar;36(3):208-216. doi: 10.1177/15459683211070277. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Upper Extremity Amputation and Prosthetics Care Across the Active Duty Military and Veteran Populations.现役军人和退伍军人中的上肢截肢与假肢护理
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 Feb;30(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.上肢截肢后的神经康复:了解神经生理变化如何影响功能康复。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 22;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0256-8.
4
Development of upper limb prostheses: current progress and areas for growth.上肢假肢的发展:当前的进展和增长领域。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jun;95(6):1013-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.021. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
5
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after traumatic upper extremity amputation: Replantation versus prosthetic rehabilitation.创伤性上肢截肢后患者报告结局的比较:再植与假肢康复
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2783-2788. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
6
Prosthetic Rehabilitation and Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation following Upper Limb Loss.上肢截肢后的假肢康复和血管化复合组织同种异体移植。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jun;143(6):1688-1701. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005638.
7
Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.创伤性四肢完全截断患者的康复:从截肢到假肢功能:病例报告。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jan;16(1):112-118. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1644675. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
8
Neurorobotics for neurorehabilitation.用于神经康复的神经机器人技术。
Science. 2021 Aug 6;373(6555):634-635. doi: 10.1126/science.abj5259.
9
Psychological distress among persons with upper extremity limb loss.上肢截肢者的心理困扰。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Nov;24(4):746-763. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12360. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance?目前上肢截肢者使用假肢的比例——创新对设备接受度有影响吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(14):3708-3713. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1866684. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and Preferences for Decision-Making for Upper Limb Prosthetic Care: The Patient Journey: A Scoping Literature Review.上肢假肢护理决策的结果与偏好:患者历程:一项范围界定文献综述
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025 Apr 25;7(2):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100460. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The neurophysiology of sensorimotor prosthetic control.感觉运动假肢控制的神经生理学
BMC Biomed Eng. 2024 Oct 1;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s42490-024-00084-y.
3
Grasp Posture Variability Leads to Greater Ipsilateral Sensorimotor Beta Activation During Simulated Prosthesis Use.
抓握姿势变化导致模拟使用假肢时对侧感觉运动β波活动增加。
J Mot Behav. 2024;56(5):579-591. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2024.2364657. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Cortical Reorganization after Limb Loss: Bridging the Gap between Basic Science and Clinical Recovery.肢体缺失后的皮质重组:弥合基础科学与临床康复之间的差距。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jan 3;44(1):e1051232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1051-23.2023.