Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Clinical Research Unit, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.
Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Clinical Research Unit, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark.
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;79(2):102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether myocardial infarction can be safely ruled in or out after 30 minutes as an alternative to 1 hour.
This was a prospective, single-center clinical study enrolling patients admitted to the emergency department. Patients with chest pain suggestive of myocardial infarction were eligible for inclusion. There was no walk-in to the emergency department, and patients with highly elevated out-of-hospital troponin were transferred directly to an invasive heart center. High-sensitivity troponin I was measured at admission (0 hour), 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 3 hours. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the sensitivity and negative predictive value (primary endpoints) as measures of ability to rule out myocardial infarction. Specificity and positive predictive value of myocardial infarction were used as measures for the ability to rule in myocardial infarction (secondary endpoints).
In total, 1,003 patients qualified for analysis. Median age was 64 (interquartile range 52 to 74) years, and 42% were women. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 9% of patients. In the validation cohort (n=503), the 0-h/30-min algorithm assigned 242 (48%) patients to rule out, 54 (11%) to rule in, and 207 (41%) to the observational zone. This resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (92.0% to 100%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval 98.5% to 100%), specificity of 96.7% (94.7% to 98.2%), and positive predictive value of 72.2% (58.4% to 83.5%). In comparison, the 0-h/1-h algorithm performed with a sensitivity of 100% (92.0% to 100%), negative predictive value of 100% (98.5% to 100%), specificity of 97.2% (95.2% to 98.5%), and positive predictive value of 75.5% (61.7% to 86.2%).
The accelerated 0-h/30-min algorithm allowed for safe rule-out of myocardial infarction 30 minutes after admission. The rule-in ability of the 0-h/30-min algorithm was comparable to that of the 0-h/1h algorithm.
本研究旨在探讨是否可以在 30 分钟而不是 1 小时后安全地排除或确诊心肌梗死。
这是一项前瞻性、单中心的临床研究,纳入了急诊科收治的患者。有疑似心肌梗死胸痛的患者符合纳入标准。急诊科没有急诊就诊,高浓度的院外肌钙蛋白升高的患者直接转至介入性心脏中心。入院时(0 小时)、30 分钟、1 小时和 3 小时测量高敏肌钙蛋白 I。使用敏感性和阴性预测值(主要终点)评估诊断性能,作为排除心肌梗死的能力指标。特异性和阳性预测值用于评估确诊心肌梗死的能力(次要终点)。
共有 1003 例患者符合分析条件。中位年龄为 64(四分位距 52 至 74)岁,42%为女性。9%的患者确诊为心肌梗死。在验证队列(n=503)中,0 小时/30 分钟算法将 242 例(48%)患者归为排除组,54 例(11%)为确诊组,207 例(41%)为观察区。其敏感性为 100%(92.0%至 100%),阴性预测值为 100%(95%置信区间 98.5%至 100%),特异性为 96.7%(94.7%至 98.2%),阳性预测值为 72.2%(58.4%至 83.5%)。相比之下,0 小时/1 小时算法的敏感性为 100%(92.0%至 100%),阴性预测值为 100%(98.5%至 100%),特异性为 97.2%(95.2%至 98.5%),阳性预测值为 75.5%(61.7%至 86.2%)。
加速的 0 小时/30 分钟算法可在入院后 30 分钟安全排除心肌梗死。0 小时/30 分钟算法的确诊能力与 0 小时/1 小时算法相当。