• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦对耐碳青霉烯类血流感染的抗菌活性及最佳治疗方案

Antibacterial Activity and Optimal Treatment of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant .

作者信息

Yu Wei, Chen Yunbo, Shen Ping, Ji Jinru, Ying Chaoqun, Liu Zhiying, Xiong Luying, Qiu Yunqing, Xiao Yonghong

机构信息

State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 14;12:771910. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.771910. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.771910
PMID:34970142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8712734/
Abstract

This work was to investigate the activity and optimal treatments of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) against bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem resistant (BSIs-CRKP). A total of 318 nonduplicate BSIs-CRKP isolates were collected from Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) program. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CZA and AZA were determined by agar dilution method. Carbapenemase genes and multilocus sequence typing were amplified by PCR. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was conducted to calculate cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of different CZA or AZA administrations. The MIC of CZA and AZA were 128/4 and 1/4 mg/L, respectively. There are 87.4 and 3.5% isolates carried and . A total of 68 ST types were identified and 29 novel ST types. ST11 accounted for 66.6%. Further MCS showed CFR of CZA using two-step infusion therapy (rapid first-step 0.5 h infusion and slow second-step 3 h infusion, TSIT) (2.5 g 0.5 h, 3.75 g every 8 h with 3 h infusion and 3.75 g 0.5 h, 2.5 g every 8 h with 3 h infusion) was above 89%. The CFR of AZA with TSIT was above 96%. TSIT with sufficient pharmacokinetic conditions could be useful for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of CZA and AZA against BSIs-CRKP.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和氨曲南-阿维巴坦(AZA)对耐碳青霉烯类血流感染(BSIs-CRKP)的活性及最佳治疗方案。从血液细菌耐药性调查协作系统(BRICS)项目中收集了318株非重复的BSIs-CRKP分离株。采用琼脂稀释法测定CZA和AZA的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。通过PCR扩增碳青霉烯酶基因和多位点序列分型。进行蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)以计算不同CZA或AZA给药方案的累积反应分数(CFR)。CZA和AZA的MIC分别为128/4和1/4 mg/L。分别有87.4%和3.5%的分离株携带 和 。共鉴定出68种ST型,其中29种为新型ST型。ST11占66.6%。进一步的MCS结果显示,采用两步输注疗法(第一步0.5小时快速输注,第二步3小时缓慢输注,TSIT)(2.5 g 0.5小时,每8小时3.75 g并3小时输注;3.75 g 0.5小时,每8小时2.5 g并3小时输注)时,CZA的CFR高于89%。AZA采用TSIT时的CFR高于96%。具备充分药代动力学条件的TSIT可能有助于提高CZA和AZA对BSIs-CRKP的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/7177e48bcab6/fphar-12-771910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/0b6feea200fc/fphar-12-771910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/2ec54cb61e3b/fphar-12-771910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/7177e48bcab6/fphar-12-771910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/0b6feea200fc/fphar-12-771910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/2ec54cb61e3b/fphar-12-771910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7138/8712734/7177e48bcab6/fphar-12-771910-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Antibacterial Activity and Optimal Treatment of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant .头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦对耐碳青霉烯类血流感染的抗菌活性及最佳治疗方案
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 14;12:771910. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.771910. eCollection 2021.
2
The Potential Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Carbapenem Resistant Clinical Isolates Harboring Different Carbapenemase Types in a Thai University Hospital.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对携带不同碳青霉烯酶类型的耐碳青霉烯临床分离株在泰国大学医院的潜在应用。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Jul 16;15:3095-3104. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S321147. eCollection 2021.
3
Activity Comparison of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Bloodstream Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms in China.中国碳青霉烯类耐药菌血流感染患者应用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦的疗效比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;11:780365. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.780365. eCollection 2021.
4
Optimal treatment of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against bloodstream infections or lower respiratory tract infections caused by extensively drug-resistant or pan drug-resistant (XDR/PDR) .优化治疗广泛耐药或全耐药(XDR/PDR)导致的血流感染或下呼吸道感染的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jun 28;13:1023948. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1023948. eCollection 2023.
5
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae: a multicentre study in northern China.药代动力学/药效学模型评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦不同给药方案治疗产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌(KPC)肺炎克雷伯菌引起的肺炎的疗效:中国北方多中心研究。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Dec;27:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiologic Characteristics of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in China.中国一家新生儿重症监护病房中耐头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的耐碳青霉烯类细菌的临床和分子流行病学特征
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jul 27;13:2571-2578. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S256922. eCollection 2020.
7
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Sequence Type 11 Due to a Mutation in Plasmid-Borne to , in Henan, China.中国河南一株序列型11的肺炎克雷伯菌因质粒携带的blaKPC-2突变导致对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 May 10;14:1725-1731. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S306095. eCollection 2021.
8
In vitro and in vivo bactericidal activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenemase-producing .头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对产碳青霉烯酶的. 的体外和体内杀菌活性。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Nov 21;7:142. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0435-9. eCollection 2018.
9
Emergence of a KPC Variant Conferring Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Widespread ST11 Carbapenem-Resistant Clone in China.在中国广泛传播的ST11碳青霉烯耐药克隆中出现对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药的KPC变体。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Aug 16;12:724272. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.724272. eCollection 2021.
10
Emergence of Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Tigecycline Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Due to In-Host Microevolution.宿主内微进化导致碳青霉烯类耐药的 中头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和替加环素耐药的出现。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Oct 25;11:757470. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.757470. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal treatment of Imipenem and meropenem against bloodstream infections caused by the Citrobacter spp.亚胺培南和美罗培南对柠檬酸杆菌属引起的血流感染的最佳治疗
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10760-6.
2
Emergence of a Novel NDM-5-Producing Sequence Type 4523 Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain Causing Bloodstream Infection in China.中国产新型 NDM-5 型 4523 型产酸克雷伯菌导致血流感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0084222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00842-22. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Activity Comparison of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Bloodstream Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms in China.中国碳青霉烯类耐药菌血流感染患者应用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦的疗效比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;11:780365. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.780365. eCollection 2021.
2
Continuous infusion, therapeutic drug monitoring and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam: a retrospective cohort study.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦持续输注、治疗药物监测和门诊肠外抗菌治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Sep;26:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Aztreonam/avibactam activity against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales collected in Europe, Asia and Latin America in 2019.
2019 年在欧洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲收集的肠杆菌科临床分离株的阿佐巴坦/阿维巴坦活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Feb 11;76(3):659-666. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa504.
4
Comparable Effect of Two-Step Versus Extended Infusions on the Pharmacokinetics of Imipenem in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock.两步输注与延长输注对脓毒症和感染性休克患者亚胺培南药代动力学的影响相当。
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2246-2255. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01339-5. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Infections.美罗培南-维巴坦与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02313-19.
6
Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and underlying mechanisms.对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的耐药性及其机制。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep;22:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study.阿兹提罗单抗/阿维巴坦治疗住院成人复杂性腹腔内感染的药代动力学和安全性:REJUVENATE 研究结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Mar 1;75(3):618-627. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz497.
8
Treatment Options for Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacterial Infections.碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染的治疗选择。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(Suppl 7):S565-S575. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz830.
9
Steady-State Ceftazidime-Avibactam Serum Concentrations and Dosing Recommendations in a Critically Ill Patient Being Treated for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia and Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration.在接受持续静脉-静脉血液透析滤过治疗铜绿假单胞菌肺炎的危重症患者中,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的稳态血清浓度和推荐剂量。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Dec;39(12):1216-1222. doi: 10.1002/phar.2338. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Searching for the Optimal Treatment for Metallo- and Serine-β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Aztreonam in Combination with Ceftazidime-avibactam or Meropenem-vaborbactam.寻找针对产金属β-内酰胺酶和丝氨酸β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌的最佳治疗方案:氨曲南联合头孢他啶-阿维巴坦或美罗培南-瓦博巴坦。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Sep 9;63(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01426-19. Epub 2019 Sep 30.