Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska.
VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, District of Columbia.
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-050996.
In this Ethics Rounds we present a conflict regarding discharge planning for a febrile infant in the emergency department. The physician believes discharge would be unsafe and would constitute a discharge against medical advice. The child's mother believes her son has been through an already extensive and painful evaluation and would prefer to monitor her well-appearing son closely at home with a safety plan and a next-day outpatient visit. Commentators assess this case from the perspective of best interest, harm-benefit, conflict management, and nondiscriminatory care principles and prioritize a high-quality informed consent process. They characterize the formalization of discharge against medical advice as problematic. Pediatricians, a pediatric resident, ethicists, an attorney, and mediator provide a range of perspectives to inform ethically justifiable options and conflict resolution practices.
在本次伦理案例讨论中,我们将呈现一个关于急诊科发热婴儿出院计划的冲突案例。医生认为出院不安全,属于违反医嘱的行为。患儿母亲则认为她的儿子已经经历了广泛而痛苦的评估,她更愿意在家中密切监测她状态良好的儿子,制定一个安全计划,并在次日安排门诊随访。评论员从最佳利益、利弊权衡、冲突管理和非歧视性护理原则的角度评估了这个案例,并将高质量的知情同意过程作为优先级。他们认为,违反医嘱的出院形式存在问题。儿科学专家、儿科住院医师、伦理学家、律师和调解员提供了一系列的观点,以提供合理的伦理选择和解决冲突的方法。