• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板聚集与卒中风险的关系: pendulum 分析。

Relationship between platelet aggregation and stroke risk after percutaneous coronary intervention: a PENDULUM analysis.

机构信息

Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Department of Clinical Medicine, National University Corporation Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2022 Jun;37(6):942-953. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02003-w. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-021-02003-w
PMID:34973085
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9114031/
Abstract

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a stent, high on-treatment platelet reactivity may be associated with an increased risk of stroke. This post hoc analysis of the PENDULUM registry compared the risk of post-PCI stroke according to on-treatment P2Y reaction unit (PRU) values. Patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent PCI were stratified by baseline PRU (at 12 and 48 h post-PCI) as either high (HPR, > 208), optimal (OPR, > 85 to ≤ 208), or low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR, ≤ 85). The incidences of non-fatal ischemic and non-ischemic stroke through to 12 months post-PCI were recorded. Almost all enrolled patients (6102/6267 [97.4%]) had a risk factor for ischemic stroke, and most were receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. Of the 5906 patients with PRU data (HPR, n = 2227; OPR, n = 3002; LPR, n = 677), 47 had a non-fatal stroke post-PCI (cumulative incidence: 0.68%, ischemic; 0.18%, non-ischemic stroke). Patients with a non-fatal ischemic stroke event had statistically significantly higher post-PCI PRU values versus those without an event (P = 0.037). The incidence of non-fatal non-ischemic stroke was not related to PRU value. When the patients were stratified by PRU ≤ 153 versus > 153 at 12-48 h post-PCI, a significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of non-fatal stroke at 12 months (P = 0.044). We found that patients with ischemic stroke tended to have higher PRU values at 12-48 h after PCI versus those without ischemic stroke.Clinical trial registration: UMIN000020332.

摘要

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和支架置入的患者中,治疗过程中的血小板高反应性可能与中风风险增加有关。本项 PENDULUM 注册研究的事后分析比较了根据治疗后 P2Y 反应单位(PRU)值的 PCI 后中风风险。年龄≥20 岁的接受 PCI 的患者根据基线 PRU(PCI 后 12 和 48 小时)分为高反应性(HPR,>208)、最佳反应性(OPR,>85 至≤208)和低反应性(LPR,≤85)。记录 PCI 后 12 个月内非致命性缺血性和非缺血性中风的发生率。几乎所有入组患者(6267 例中的 6102 例[97.4%])均存在缺血性中风的危险因素,且大多数患者正在接受双联抗血小板治疗。在有 PRU 数据的 5906 例患者中(HPR,n=2227;OPR,n=3002;LPR,n=677),47 例患者发生 PCI 后非致命性中风(累积发生率:0.68%,缺血性;0.18%,非缺血性中风)。发生非致命性缺血性中风事件的患者与无事件患者相比,PCI 后 PRU 值明显更高(P=0.037)。非致命性非缺血性中风的发生率与 PRU 值无关。当根据 PCI 后 12-48 小时 PRU 值≤153 与>153 将患者分层时,12 个月时非致命性中风的累积发生率存在显著差异(P=0.044)。我们发现,与无缺血性中风的患者相比,发生缺血性中风的患者 PCI 后 12-48 小时的 PRU 值往往更高。临床试验注册:UMIN000020332。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/39f5884ead74/380_2021_2003_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/3d2e3a89a683/380_2021_2003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/407f2343d798/380_2021_2003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/fc6ba364aee0/380_2021_2003_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/39f5884ead74/380_2021_2003_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/3d2e3a89a683/380_2021_2003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/407f2343d798/380_2021_2003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/fc6ba364aee0/380_2021_2003_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1fd/9114031/39f5884ead74/380_2021_2003_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between platelet aggregation and stroke risk after percutaneous coronary intervention: a PENDULUM analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板聚集与卒中风险的关系: pendulum 分析。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jun;37(6):942-953. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02003-w. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
2
Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients: 1-Year Results of the PENDULUM Registry.东亚患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性与缺血和出血事件的关系:PENDULUM 登记研究的 1 年结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015439. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
A therapeutic window for platelet reactivity for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-PROVE (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity for Outcome Validation Effort) study.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的血小板反应性治疗窗口:ARMYDA-PROVE(抗血小板治疗减少血管成形术期间心肌损伤-血小板反应性以验证结果)研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.009.
4
Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Periprocedural Myonecrosis in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板反应性与围手术期心肌坏死的关系
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Dec;31(12):E369-E375.
5
Ischemic and Bleeding Events in PENDULUM Patients With High Bleeding Risk and High Platelet Reactivity.具有高出血风险和高血小板反应性的PENDULUM患者的缺血和出血事件
Circ J. 2022 Apr 25;86(5):763-771. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0717. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Troponin-Negative Patients With Low-Risk ACS Undergoing Ad Hoc PCI.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的低危 ACS 且肌钙蛋白阴性患者的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 16;67(6):603-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.044.
7
Platelet Reactivity and Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: From the ADAPT-DES Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后血小板反应性与缺血性卒中风险:ADAPT-DES 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1277-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.263. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Stent Thrombosis In Belgium (STIB) trial.稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血小板反应性与心血管事件:比利时支架血栓形成(STIB)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):204-11. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A34.
9
Is There an Ideal Level of Platelet P2Y12-Receptor Inhibition in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: "Window" Analysis From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制的理想水平是多少?:来自 ADAPT-DES 研究(药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗评估)的“窗口”分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1978-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.032.
10
Observational Study of Platelet Reactivity in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Due to Coronary Stent Thrombosis Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the European PREvention of Stent Thrombosis by an Interdisciplinary Global European Effort Registry.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉支架血栓形成所致 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血小板反应性的观察性研究:来自欧洲跨学科全球努力预防支架血栓形成登记研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2548-2556. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-herb Synergistic Interactions between Clopidogrel and Natural Medicine.氯吡格雷与天然药物的药物-草药协同相互作用。
Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2024;22(4):421-431. doi: 10.2174/1871525722666230907112509.
2
Time-dependent changes in P2Y12 reaction unit values for predicting the different types of cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic heart disease.时间依赖性变化的 P2Y12 反应单位值可预测缺血性心脏病患者不同类型的心血管事件。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Oct;38(10):1218-1227. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02279-0. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2020 breakthroughs in early secondary prevention: dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy.2020 年早期二级预防的突破:双联抗血小板治疗与单联抗血小板治疗。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):45-54. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000878.
2
The Phenomenon of Clopidogrel High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Ischemic Stroke Subjects: A Comprehensive Review.缺血性卒中患者中氯吡格雷高治疗时血小板反应性现象:一项综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 3;21(17):6408. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176408.
3
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.
2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
4
Platelet function/reactivity testing and prediction of risk of recurrent vascular events and outcomes after TIA or ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.血小板功能/反应性检测与 TIA 或缺血性卒中后复发血管事件及结局风险的预测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2020 Oct;267(10):3021-3037. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09932-y. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Prasugrel by Stroke Subtype: A Sub-Analysis of the PRASTRO-I Randomized Controlled Trial.普拉格雷治疗不同类型卒中的疗效及安全性:PRASTRO-I 随机对照试验的亚组分析。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Feb 1;28(2):169-180. doi: 10.5551/jat.56093. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: Systematic review and meta-analysis.缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者氯吡格雷高血小板反应性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jul;29(7):104877. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104877. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients: 1-Year Results of the PENDULUM Registry.东亚患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性与缺血和出血事件的关系:PENDULUM 登记研究的 1 年结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015439. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
JCS 2020 Guideline Focused Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.《日本循环学会(JCS)2020年冠状动脉疾病患者抗栓治疗指南重点更新》
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):831-865. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1109. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家特定缺血性卒中、脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171-179. doi: 10.1159/000506396. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease: from the past to the future prospective.冠状动脉疾病中的双联抗血小板治疗:从过去到未来展望
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00642-w. Epub 2020 Jan 22.